Packers Resign Tyler Ervin.

Fredrik87

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 23, 2020
Messages
339
Reaction score
47
Location
Indiana
According to Field Yates the Packers are resigning Tyler Ervin to a 1 year deal valued at $1.047 million, with a $137,500 signing bonus.

Ervin will carry a $887,500 cap hit.

He returned six kicks for 160 yards (26.7-yard average) and 11 punts for 106 yards (9.4) in 2019.
 

Sanguine camper

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
2,151
Reaction score
730
I like the move! Ervin is a very versatile player. Looks like RB depth isn't a huge draft issue. Look for Gute to add a RB well down in the draft around the sixth round.
 

TomBrownFan40

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
196
Reaction score
30
Location
Rochester, New York, USA
This move won't get big headlines but, I'm thrilled. I believe the Packers were on Ararat, Noah was the coach, and Japheth was special teams coordinator the last time we had a consistent return game.
 

Dantés

Gute Loot
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
12,116
Reaction score
3,036
This move won't get big headlines but, I'm thrilled. I believe the Packers were on Ararat, Noah was the coach, and Japheth was special teams coordinator the last time we had a consistent return game.

So that part when Noah gets drunk and Ham mocks him... was that like after a loss to the Bears?
 

lambeaulambo

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
2,740
Reaction score
805
Location
Rest Home
last returner worth mention was roelle preston...this ervin kid has just got a knack for it..well done
 

G0P4ckG0

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Messages
761
Reaction score
153
Micah Hyde? Cobb? Will Blackmon?
All were good but none should have been primary returners...Preston was more of a return specialist much like Ervin is. Preston, Ervin, and Howard are the only 3 names I can safely say have been true return specialists in the past 30+ years
 
OP
OP
Fredrik87

Fredrik87

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 23, 2020
Messages
339
Reaction score
47
Location
Indiana
All were good but none should have been primary returners...Preston was more of a return specialist much like Ervin is. Preston, Ervin, and Howard are the only 3 names I can safely say have been true return specialists in the past 30+ years
I'd say Trevor Davis was as well but had only one good year and never really panned out in that role.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
Hyde was a natural return man, had the ability to catch and make a guy miss and get up field. I think he had obvious ability to work through traffic.
 

GleefulGary

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
5,014
Reaction score
507
Hyde was good, Blackmon had 3 TD returns in a season, Trevor Davis was really good when healthy.
 
OP
OP
Fredrik87

Fredrik87

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 23, 2020
Messages
339
Reaction score
47
Location
Indiana
I immediately went to Hyde in my mind. Folks saying he didn't have a nack for it need to go back and watch games.
Definitely, I've been watching a lot of the old games on NFL game pass and he had a return TD in at least 2 of the games I've watched.

The 2 plays I remember Hyde for the most though are his ridicules backhanded interception of Teddy Bridgwater and his interception of Prescott in the divisional round.
I still can't understand why we let him walk without at least making a offer.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
Definitely, I've been watching a lot of the old games on NFL game pass and he had a return TD in at least 2 of the games I've watched.

The 2 plays I remember Hyde for the most though are his ridicules backhanded interception of Teddy Bridgwater and his interception of Prescott in the divisional round.
I still can't understand why we let him walk without at least making a offer.
Because we had just invested another contract in Burnett and our 1st round selection safety was coming off a probowl selection and looked like he was headed in the right directions. They weren't going to give a starter contract that Hyde was worth and going to get when he was our back up.

Had we known Burnett was going to break down quickly and Dix was going to suck i'm sure they'd have done it differently.
 
OP
OP
Fredrik87

Fredrik87

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 23, 2020
Messages
339
Reaction score
47
Location
Indiana
Because we had just invested another contract in Burnett and our 1st round selection safety was coming off a probowl selection and looked like he was headed in the right directions. They weren't going to give a starter contract that Hyde was worth and going to get when he was our back up.

Had we known Burnett was going to break down quickly and Dix was going to suck i'm sure they'd have done it differently.

They gave enough money to Nick Perry to have paid for both Hyde and Peppers. And I at the time already was projecting Perry as a bust (injury history and mediocre production outside of contract year) we also gave a boatload of dough to Bennett.

Hyde got peanuts from the bills and made all-pro at CB, I get you can't resign everybody but we should of at least made a offer he didn't end up getting a big contract and we could have easily afforded him.
Worst case we could of moved him to CB as we were weak there and had him as depth for safety if needed.
When the best player on your secondary can be had for around 5 million you just don't let him walk without making a offer period.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
I was not a huge fan of investing big money into Perry, I think they did about as best they could given the circumstances. He did perform when healthy, he was probably the 2nd best pass rusher in the FA market the year he got his deal, we had a very definite need to have one and they tried to mitigate his injury risk with lower guaranteed money that would only hurt for 2 years or so and could be gotten out from underneath ok. Unfortunately that is exactly what we needed to do because he never played another healthy down for us I don't think after that contract. That one hurt.

But, Hyde was the back up, they had made their investment in Burnett and Dix was on a cheap rookie deal and heading the right way. obviously knowing what we know now different choices would have been made. wasn't a slam dunk no brainer decision, but I think that was their thought process and at the time it didn't seem as bad as it ended up. But when you have a guy that was rated a 1st round pick by almost everyone for a reason, and he just came off a pro bowl season, named all pro, and had 5 int's with an arrow pointing up yet and still on a 5th year option rookie contract knowing that in a season you're going to have to up that, the 4th or 5th rounder who is a good football player, but up now probably wasn't the priority.
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
Hyde got peanuts from the bills and made all-pro at CB, I get you can't resign everybody but we should of at least made a offer he didn't end up getting a big contract and we could have easily afforded him.

Thompson made the decision to let Hayward and Hyde walk away in free agency based on the impression that the Packers had a deep secondary at that point.

While in hindsight TT was wrong about it there's no way he could have known the team would have been better off by re-signing both of them. With limited cap space available it seemed to be the correct move to not match the offer for either of them.

Just for the record, Hyde made second team All-Pro at safety in 2017.
 

Members online

Top