digsthepack
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 2,486
- Reaction score
- 0
GM THOMPSON: MANAGEMENT REVIEW
Ever so eloquent, as always, warhawk.
Ever so eloquent, as always, warhawk.
TOPHAT said:Already, based upon 2 years, fans, scouts, and experts are making good judgements based the bottom-line records etc. Also, the news articles are very good as background to judge GM TT for a postseason, predraft performance evaluation. After losing Green and Martin [claiming he wanted him back too], it is good timing to see what the fans have to say to express their frustrations about it. I ran similar polls elsewhere, but more about that later.
I think the timing of everything determines the results. I'm really shocked to see 22 for Thompson. I thought it'd be split 50-50. Fans will express their frustrations now but those very same fans will flip flop if the Packers are in the playoffs next off season. Same goes for vice versa.
That's why polls this early are people blowing off smoke.
Yep, he has begun to clean up the mess MS left behind and he is a wreck. Holmgren was GONE regardless of money because he wanted total control. And just how well did that work for him in the first 4 or 5 years in Seattle. For ****, that is how it went. He only began to win meaningfully when stripped of GM duties.
Try again.
digsthepack said:Yep, he has begun to clean up the mess MS left behind and he is a wreck. Holmgren was GONE regardless of money because he wanted total control. And just how well did that work for him in the first 4 or 5 years in Seattle. For ****, that is how it went. He only began to win meaningfully when stripped of GM duties.
Try again.
And the packers are morons for not givin him total control!!
AFTER 2 YEARS+, THE FANS' FEEDBACKS ARE FASCINATING MEASURED BY A POLL THREAD, ESPECIALLY ABOUT THE DIRECTION OF TEAM WRITTEN BY JOURNALISTS, FANS, SPORTS COMMENTORS, ETC. ROUTINE.
FANS, IF NONE OF OPTIONS TO YOUR LIKING, USE OTHER/COMMENTS.
I AGREE THE EARLY VOTING IS INTERESTING, BUT GIVE IT TIME.
GOOD LUCK!
The Packers need a good offseason to fix their defense,
TOPHAT said:The Packers need a good offseason to fix their defense,
And we're suppose to care what this guy says...
all about da packers said:Great to have you on board posting TOPHAT.
As for the Martin thing, I believe it was a Press Gazette column writer (name escapes me) that said Martin was healthy late in the year but the Packers didn't activate him on game day.
Not sure they were making a serious ploy to have Martin return.
Gee, Green Bay not getting a good grade in FA after the first week.
That's supposed to be what? Astounding news?
Did anyone really believe TT would get a good grade early?
TT's strength as a GM starts between now and the end of the draft. He finds guys that will help at a reasonable cost and hits the draft with a vengence.
Grade him after that. At this point he has'nt gotten past the first page of the test yet.
Plus that article did not address the future ramifications of these signings what so ever. The cap does not continue to go up like it has the last couple of years and you will be seeing future articles like "49rs lose so and so and so and so" to FA.
They have cemented a position of making it very difficult to get better over the next few years so they better hope what is being written about these wonderful moves comes true because they're screwed down the road.
I would be willing to bet if you pulled the " 1st week winners" articles from last year out most of those mentioned did nada. I KNOW I remember Washington getting applause early for their great moves....and wasn't it Indy?....yes, Indy that they were talking about getting hurt bad because they lost this running back they had named James.
If I remember right it didn't turn out to bad for them. My short term memory still rules!
bozz_2006 said:thanks tophat. great stuff. my only complaint is your bold-facing everything... but you didn't do that on this post! thanks man. I think i speak for all here when i say we really appreciate your insights. keep them coming please.