RRyder
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 1,781
- Reaction score
- 192
I'm not going to fault you for being late to the discussion, nor for getting things incorrect due to not realistically being able to follow every post I or someone else makes. My position of thinking the Packers WR group was too inexperienced, unproven and comprised of mostly later round or UDFA's is the same now as it was 6 months ago. I wasn't confident in them then, nor am I now. Thus, I have been preaching signing a FA for a long time. So yes, that was part of the discussion then and continues to be.
Billy Turner was paid $28 M for 4 years, that, along with cutting Daniels would have been plenty of money to sign a #2 FA WR off my list of 5, 2 of them without having to cut Daniels. I agree with you, using hindsight right now to say Turner now appears to be a good signing, isn't really fair to bring into the discussion. Seems to me most posters here lambasted Gute for signing him anyway. I actually would still say knowing what I know now, I would still have preferred a WR being signed over Turner.
I'll be honest, its annoying to keep repeating myself as new people jump into the "debate", I've said my peace and respect Mondio's opinion, as well as anyone's, even if we don't agree.
I'm looking forward to the next 13+ games and hope that every one of our WR's proves me to be an idiot.
Hold on.... Are people just accepting the espn rankings that have Turner ranked the best pass blocking Guard in the league and Lane Taylor ranked #3?
I challenge anyone to watch the Bears and Vikings games again and say with a strait face that they agree with those matchup win percentages