mongoosev
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Messages
- 1,384
- Reaction score
- 175
Btw...didn't know Scots had mafia members named Tony.i like the way you just type random letters. it takes my focus off of the posts that i do understand.
Btw...didn't know Scots had mafia members named Tony.i like the way you just type random letters. it takes my focus off of the posts that i do understand.
Don't you worry sir, it was noted
Now Mr Dantes, are we gonnae have an issue here like. better awa n bile yer heid afore I send big Tony ower tae gie ye a skelp.
ken fit a mean?
Would you like a translation?i like the way you just type random letters. it takes my focus off of the posts that i do understand.
I do like a bit of black pudding, or blood pudding as I think most here would call it, but gives me horrendous heartburn in my old ageWhy don't you go eat some oatmeal made with blood or something.
I had to look up "skelp." Good to know.
nah, that would take away the mystery.Would you like a translation?
The Minnesota Maori's...I think we got a winner.I think I DID say I understood the Redskin controversy, I just cannot see where the Viking logo was offensive. I even read recently that up until the 1960s, Australian Aboriginies came under the flora and fauna act of Australia, tecnically classing them as animals ! , now THAT is disgusting.
I'm going to take a wild shot in the dark here and guess that I'm probably the most liberal member of this board, and this politically correct "woke" crap makes me want to vomit too. This ridiculous obsession with launching a full-scale crusade against anything and everything that shows the least little sign that it might somehow be an injustice to someone, somewhere, in some halfassed way is enough to make me tear my hair out. We don't have enough things in our society that are worth fighting about as it is?Isn`t this political correctness gone mad ? I get the fury about the "Redskins" debacle, even though I couldn`t for the life of me understand quite how it was offensive but, the Viking logo ? How can that be remotely offensive to anybody ? Seriously stupid.
If people actually knew where these names came from and that there were Native players people could appreciate the history. But then I’m sure they would argue about the exploitation and such. So yeah, anything in the past is marred by association to racism, nationalism, etc.I'm going to take a wild shot in the dark here and guess that I'm probably the most liberal member of this board, and this politically correct "woke" crap makes me want to vomit too. This ridiculous obsession with launching a full-scale crusade against anything and everything that shows the least little sign that it might somehow be an injustice to someone, somewhere, in some halfassed way is enough to make me tear my hair out. We don't have enough things in our society that are worth fighting about as it is?
I can understand something like "Redskins", I can probably understand racial stereotypes like Chief Wahoo and Chief Knock-a-homa or whatever, I can maybe understand the "tomahawk chop" (even if I don't agree with those last two), but this Viking thing is ridiculous. It's just going out of your way to find reasons to start a fight. Hell, I'm still mad about "cancelling" the North Dakota Fighting Sioux. What's next, we boycott Notre Dame because they're discriminating against the Irish? Enough already, leave this **** alone and stick to things that actually matter.
God damn, it's hard to be a liberal sometimes, when you can't stand 90% of the people whose side you're supposedly on. What ever happened to the common sense in this country?
If people actually knew where these names came from and that there were Native players people could appreciate the history. But then I’m sure they would argue about the exploitation and such. So yeah, anything in the past is marred by association to racism, nationalism, etc.
I'm going to take a wild shot in the dark here and guess that I'm probably the most liberal member of this board, and this politically correct "woke" crap makes me want to vomit too. This ridiculous obsession with launching a full-scale crusade against anything and everything that shows the least little sign that it might somehow be an injustice to someone, somewhere, in some halfassed way is enough to make me tear my hair out. We don't have enough things in our society that are worth fighting about as it is?
I can understand something like "Redskins", I can probably understand racial stereotypes like Chief Wahoo and Chief Knock-a-homa or whatever, I can maybe understand the "tomahawk chop" (even if I don't agree with those last two), but this Viking thing is ridiculous. It's just going out of your way to find reasons to start a fight. Hell, I'm still mad about "cancelling" the North Dakota Fighting Sioux. What's next, we boycott Notre Dame because they're discriminating against the Irish? Enough already, leave this **** alone and stick to things that actually matter.
God damn, it's hard to be a liberal sometimes, when you can't stand 90% of the people whose side you're supposedly on. What ever happened to the common sense in this country?
I do hope you make the effort to take the safety courses and get to the range a few times a year to practice. The people you need the weapon for aren't going to wait for her to google "how to load my pistol."There's a good reason my wife told me she wanted a small pistol for her birthday a couple of years ago, and why I carry when we're out in public, and it ain't because we're paranoid.
Slightly different subject but relevant here. Some years ago, the city I live in in the UK, which has a BIG asian community decided to do away with Christmas celebration, and call it Winter festival because it might offend the Muslims etc. People in the city were furious, including the Muslim/Asian community. It seems some middleclass white people in office decided to take offence on THIER behalf as it MIGHT offend them.Geez you'd think in the politically correct capital of the world this would have been fixed by now.
FWIW I hate this stuff. How many people are really, really offended? These are mascots, not political statements. It's silly, IMO.
I say old chap, are you slightly upset ?Don't you worry sir, it was noted
Now Mr Dantes, are we gonnae have an issue here like. better awa n bile yer heid afore I send big Tony ower tae gie ye a skelp.
ken fit a mean?
Obviously never heard of the Glasgow ice cream wars before now ?Btw...didn't know Scots had mafia members named Tony.
Obviously never heard of the Glasgow ice cream wars before now ?
No one has satisfactorily explained the difference between "cultural appropriation" and appreciating and adopting other cultures in a multi-ethnic society.
i am also in an interracial marriage. but i live in probably the most liberal state in the u.s. - california. i don't even bother to vote any more because you always know who's going to win before the election. but my wife and i have been to wisconsin a few times to visit family and i was keenly aware of people staring and giving dirty looks. not from my family, mind you. there's been other interracial relationships in my family. but just being out in public together.I mean, I'm in an interracial marriage myself, and we live in the South. Believe me, I'm not exactly insensitive to racial issues, or naive about them.
Illegally being the key word. One can require a license for the gun, a license for the owner, and whatever the insurance aspect would be, but why would the bad guys bother, if they don't now? And, for that matter, the reason I carry uninsured motorists insurance is...I find it amazing that we have people believing that owning weapons, and carrying them every where is just fine, but driving a car requires vehicle licensing, driver's licensing, and insurance. We should be applying those three mandates on those that own guns, you'd think. If we did, we might be able to keep a fairly substantial number of illegally owned guns off the street, or at least be able to identify who shouldn't have them.
I'm one of the people out here who has used a weapon to defend his country, and worked in law enforcement. Whether or not anyone does, or doesn't agree with me doesn't matter. It's just my own perspective.
Licenses mean carrying picture documentation that shows you've followed the laws on ownership, just like you would with a car. Those who violate the law would be dealt with under the law. Of course there would be violators. There are with cars. In some areas, enormous numbers of them. You just keep making arrests, and doing what you need to do.Illegally being the key word. One can require a license for the gun, a license for the owner, and whatever the insurance aspect would be, but why would the bad guys bother, if they don't now? And, for that matter, the reason I carry uninsured motorists insurance is...
ain't that the truth? about 23 years ago, my wife was driving our son to middle school, and was stopped by the crossing guard to turn left into the school parking lot. an uninsured motorist plowed into her from behind. our son was uninjured, but because my wife was turned in her seat to watch for an opening to move, the left side of her spine and the surrounding soft tissue were traumatized. while she had a relatively quick recovery, it wasn't a full recovery, and she continues to experience pain. there was a small settlement from our insurance company because we had uninsured motorist insurance. but believe me when i tell you that it wasn't enough to compensate our financial losses or her pain.Of course there would be violators. There are with cars. In some areas, enormous numbers of them.
You sure are cranky today. Lol Just playing.I find it amazing that we have people believing that owning weapons, and carrying them every where is just fine, but driving a car requires vehicle licensing, driver's licensing, and insurance. We should be applying those three mandates on those that own guns, you'd think. If we did, we might be able to keep a fairly substantial number of illegally owned guns off the street, or at least be able to identify who shouldn't have them.
I'm one of the people out here who has used a weapon to defend his country, and worked in law enforcement. Whether or not anyone does, or doesn't agree with me doesn't matter. It's just my own perspective.
Sorry about that! I didn't want to sound cranky. It's just that I am bothered by the fact that people need to feel they have to carry fire arms to protect themselves. We shouldn't be living in a society like that. So much has gone by the wayside, and it's unsettling for everyone.You sure are cranky today. Lol Just playing.
I've been working in downtown Milwaukee for over 30 yrs and never did I feel this unsafe and have been concealing for 5 yrs now. Been around guns all my life and never did I imagine i'd be concealing. first thing in the morning I put my gun in my desk and it's all business from there until I get off and have to conceal again when I walk to my car. Speaking of which it's almost time to conceal and go home. Hah.
Brother… if this woke stuff makes you sick and you conceal carry, let me tell you, you are not the most liberal member of this forum.
But I hope your bride gets her pistol and never has to use it!