Packer Fan in SD
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 838
- Reaction score
- 178
WD-40!
Know what?
- Thread starter longtimefan
- Start date
If you haven't let too much smoke out, a tap with the magic screwdriver could save it. It worked on the robot I was fixing tonight.
Dieseljunkie12
Cheesehead
If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.
Sky King
158.3
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
- Messages
- 2,817
- Reaction score
- 331
Hmmmm...I'll need to give that a try.
Sky King
158.3
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
- Messages
- 2,817
- Reaction score
- 331
Back to Penny Lane again.
gbgary
Cheesehead
i've got news for you. what we're seeing is rodgers best at this point of his career. less drops would make things better. a stud TE would. higher percentage passes, using the middle of the field, the ball coming out earlier, would make things better.
PackAttack12
R-E-L-A-X
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2016
- Messages
- 6,500
- Reaction score
- 2,157
So you said we have been seeing the best of Aaron Rodgers at this point of his career, yet listed several reasons why we haven’t actually seen Rodgers’ best. Ha.
Even better is he can't see how drops effect "using the middle of the field" or a reason why he's been shying away from it. Or how the quality of receiver effects the timing of the ball coming out. of course we see him do all of those things, and still very well. but some would like us to believe he can't.
But I agree, just when you think you can't make up some of the stuff people say, you realize they are, and they believe it LOL
Favre>Rodgers259
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2015
- Messages
- 2,243
- Reaction score
- 130
Comes with the territory, go nuts.
OP
OP
It seems apparent that MVS hasn’t grown much with more playing time, and this is what we can expect. That’s not good enough long term.
As for Rodgers, it seems like he’s faded, but it’s hard to isolate that from a receiving corps (outside Adams) that gets a grade of C+
Adding (or drafting) a solid #2 receiver behind Adams will help - next year. For now, MLF has to play the cards he has. Probably enough to get past Seattle. Probably not enough to get past SF.
That sounds disappointing, but after two dismal years, this year’s team has been a lot of fun to watch (even if they can’t win the NFCCG or the SB).
I can only speak for myself, but I wasn’t expecting 13 wins and a first round bye back in August.
As for Rodgers, it seems like he’s faded, but it’s hard to isolate that from a receiving corps (outside Adams) that gets a grade of C+
Adding (or drafting) a solid #2 receiver behind Adams will help - next year. For now, MLF has to play the cards he has. Probably enough to get past Seattle. Probably not enough to get past SF.
That sounds disappointing, but after two dismal years, this year’s team has been a lot of fun to watch (even if they can’t win the NFCCG or the SB).
I can only speak for myself, but I wasn’t expecting 13 wins and a first round bye back in August.
gbgary
Cheesehead
no. listed a couple of things that would make the offense better.
I was.
[see my sig]
OldSchool101
Pack
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 15,819
- Reaction score
- 6,777
Just don’t end up with Eleanor Rigby and you should do just fine.
scotscheese
Cheesehead
tynimiller
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 14,942
- Reaction score
- 5,572
I do admit it is hilarious how many folks rave about how TERRIBLE our WR corps is and then in same breath want to say Rodgers has been terrible as well.....dude put up 4,002 - 26 - 4 year.
IF our receiving corps is as bad as many claim, what Rodgers has managed to do is nothing short of incredible....
IF our receiving corps is as bad as many claim, what Rodgers has managed to do is nothing short of incredible....
OP
OP
That is what I wanted to see from him
