And now you're speaking for everyone else.
BTW, I know there's one poster happy with the Packers defensive effort yesterday because they perfectly matched their 2015 season average median points allowed.
On a serious note, here's a video that was posted here a while ago about tackling techniques.
Try to ignore where the information is coming from. IMO the packers would benefit by teaching these techniques.
http://smartfootball.com/defense/pe...for-head-injury#sthash.hSncwTvy.QoJMv45r.dpbs
I've now been through the replay.
I have often commented, more times than I care to count, that this is often a poor tackling defense that needs pursuit and second effort to get the job done. McCarthy carps about it in the press, after which it improves for a time, and then relapses. So what's your point?
It's a bit ironic that my final straw with Capers was the 7 quarter stretch last season without forcing a punt, which included the Bears game. The replay bore out what I suspected from the play-by-play...this effort was out of the same mold as last season's Bears game where zero punts were forced. This time it was one punt. The resemblance is further noted in the silver lining...stiffening is the shorter field , a key turnover.
So what revelation do you think you are affording me now that I did not already afford you nearly a year ago, and many times since?
As for Carrol's shoulder-to-thigh technique, that's hardly a revelation. The Packers do a lot of ankle biting as in this game...then they improve for a while...then they regress. Leroy Butler made the point succinctly this past week, specifically with respect to Dix, that he needs to take one more step then strike as opposed to one less step and then diving.