Sunshinepacker
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2013
- Messages
- 5,818
- Reaction score
- 942
My theory is that this franchise places a lot of importance on veteran experience. Hence why King is playing over, theoretically his replacement in Stokes. At this point, I'd rather Stokes trial by fire than continue to watch King get destroyed or make stupid error after stupid error. We know what King can bring, it can't be any worse with Stokes who may make a mistake, but has the speed like Shields did, to make up for it or to make a play. Put King in the slot and have him cover TE's or run block. He's got no upside out on the perimeter anymore.
I think we're making these assessments after watching less than 60 snaps while the coaches are making these choices after seeing VASTLY more than we do.
Stokes is a physical marvel but he had a LOT to work on before being a decent NFL starter. Breaking his illegal contact habit is going to take time. Pretty much any coach will take a substandard starter over a guy that gives up first downs by penalty all the time.
Look, I'm obviously not a King fan but even I didn't expect King to be THAT bad this game. If fans wanted King to be gone then they need to look squarely at the guy that didn't feel the need to replace his eventual successor with a draft pick in 2019 or 2020 or sign a free agent.
Edit: I also agree that the front office places a ton of value on history with the team but I don't think coaches give two sh*ts about history if he's being significantly outplayed during practice.