3rd downs.....4 for 13
Tell me that offense played good ?
Tell me that offense played good ?
So modify it how
explain
I really think Saturday is hitting an unfortunate combination of details. He's a little small and he's getting old. He beat small with smart previously, but he's new to our scheme and can't fall back on smart. The line is otherwise intact and yet they appear to be playing worse than last year.
Staring with the 2nd half of Seattle the Pack didnt really give up any sacks...
1st half today no sacks..2nd half all went to hell
About 8 quart/ 2 full games Saturday no issues..but in one half Saturday had all these issues?
You're missing a key part of my argument--the running game.
Right now, the offense is dependent on Benson. Those 8 quarters featured his runs. He kept the chains moving and shook defenses out of a 2-deep shell. Losing him today was probably the difference.
This dependence on Benson is why I start looking at Saturday. It was the norm last season to offense to do pretty much whatever they wanted throwing the ball even lacking the running game. Obvious exceptions the Chiefs and Giants.
This year, we just can't. What changed? Philbin is probably part of it, but we're giving up more pressure this year with 4 out of the 5 same starters on the line. Bulaga in particular is much worse. Why? Worse communication? Possible. Sitton having to help Saturday more, leaving Bulaga without help? Possible. In my mind, a lot of that kind of blame falls on the center. Of course, Bulaga could have an injury or something, but he went from possibly the best right tackle in football last year to possibly the worst this year. Something is going on there.
Losing Wells hurt. I'm not saying we should have kept him, we might not have been able to match his requirements. He might have just wanted out because of losing his spot to Spitz in 2008(?). We had to scramble to replace him. I figured Saturday would get us through a season and we'd draft the center of the future in 2013. I'm not sure he make it through the season after watching him so far. Not that EDS would be better, but there isn't improvement, was choice do they have?
=
If off has more then 3 and outs in 2nd half, might be that the d isnt on field as so much
Thank goodness McCarthy doesn’t “get mad”; coaching with excessive emotion is at best short-lived and generally foolish: Much better to coach with one’s brain. And of course this is the same coach whose team beat opponents on average by 12.6 points/game last season. Saying he doesn’t know how to go for the jugular is directly contradicted by the 2011 season. For example, on the opening drive of the second half against the Colts on third down McCarthy’s play call wasn’t too conservative. According to Rodgers that pass for a first down got (barely) tipped. That wasn’t a conservative call, it just didn’t work out.The offense stank in the second half because MM does not know how to go for the jugular and start killing teams. He never gets mad and plays too conservatively. That's why we lose.
Through nine weeks of the 2011 season, the Packers defense was No. 30 overall. It was eighth against the run, 31st against the pass and 17th in the league in sacks. Through nine weeks of this season, the Packers defense is 12th overall. It’s 10th against the run, 20th against the pass and No. 1 in the league in sacks.
In 2009, the Packers’ D was 7th in the league surrendering an average of 18.6 ppg. In 2010 the Packers D was 2nd at 15.0 ppg. In 2011, they were 19th at 22.4 ppg. So far this season Capers’ D is 11th surrendering 20.8 ppg. That averages out to 19.0 ppg over the span of Capers’ time in Green Bay and that usually puts a defense in the top 10. For fans who would fire him based upon one season out of three, what if Capers’ D ends up in the top 10 in scoring D again this season? That would be 3 seasons out of 4 in the top 10 in scoring D. At that point last year's D would look a lot more like an aberration in Capers stay in Green Bay, wouldn’t it?Analysis—The improvement on defense is dramatic. A year ago, the Packers were on their way to becoming the worst overall defense with the worst pass defense and fewest sacks per pass play in the league. A year later, the Packers are on the verge of becoming a top 10 defense, again, or better. It’s a unit that’s making big plays with young players, and injuries are forcing it to build and reveal depth. Injuries, of course, are the big concern. The Packers may have reached the saturation point, especially at linebacker.
I don't often use stats but when I do I use yours ThxJack.This is from the latest article posted in the Packers.com News forum:
In 2009, the Packers’ D was 7th in the league surrendering an average of 18.6 ppg. In 2010 the Packers D was 2nd at 15.0 ppg. In 2011, they were 19th at 22.4 ppg. So far this season Capers’ D is 11th surrendering 20.8 ppg. That averages out to 19.0 ppg over the span of Capers’ time in Green Bay and that usually puts a defense in the top 10. For fans who would fire him based upon one season out of three, what if Capers’ D ends up in the top 10 in scoring D again this season? That would be 3 seasons out of 4 in the top 10 in scoring D. At that point last year's D would look a lot more like an aberration in Capers stay in Green Bay, wouldn’t it?