C-Lee
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2015
- Messages
- 2,144
- Reaction score
- 420
Wouldn't be surprised if his NFL career is over. Sad story.
And guess what, Hundley and McCarthy are still in GB...……..
Along with them, and players getting injured, I'm hoping for a better season this year.
Then what? At his best, <4% above league average for a 1,000 yd. runner considered a "power back" speaks to my point.
Like I posted in another thread, I have no questions about what the offense will do as long as AR stays healthy, which is what we have to assume because without AR we aint winning a SB anyway. To your point, the biggest key is just how much will Pettine be able to improve the defense?
Get it to a top 12 defense and we'll have something cooking. Hell I'll even take top 15 in the first year.
I think Pettine will have guys in the right spots. There won't be near as much confusion and dysfunction. Strategically and schematically speaking, I think he'll have a 5 or 6 spot impact just based on those factors alone.While Pettine might have a significant impact on the performance of the defense the Packers need the talent level of the unit to be improved as well to make a decent jump.
I think Pettine will have guys in the right spots. There won't be near as much confusion and dysfunction. Strategically and schematically speaking, I think he'll have a 5 or 6 spot impact just based on those factors alone.
We definitely shouldn't be expecting an elite defense in the first season though.
Correct, I wasn't insinuating such a thing.I highly doubt the Packers have enough talent to feature an elite defense, no matter who is coordinating the unit.
I don't recall ever saying that, though it would be the popular perception. I do recall defending Carrol's fateful decision to throw rather than run Lynch at the goal line in that Super Bowl loss I believe in debate with you. If your stats are right, where he underperformed the league average, that popular perception might be wrong.I believe you considered Marshawn Lynch a pretty effective power back during that tenure. Guess what, he only converted 63.5% in those situations.
You didn't answer the question of what Lacy did in this regard in years 3 and 4.
You did? Where?Actually I posted the numbers for Lacy since the start of the 2015 season. In years three and four he converted 19 of 31 (61.3%) plays in those situations.
You did? Where?
As noted previously, with video, he looked lighter last season while his performance declined precipitously. Big Eddie was quickier in 2016 than 2015, putting up impressive numbers, just not in short yardage.My bad, I thought that I posted it in one of my previous posts. As it might be expected Lacy has struggled in short yardage situations since the start of the 2015 season once he decided to not put in the work necessary to stay in shape.
yeah it's sad to see such talent just fade. watched the pack vs. pats game from 2014, and the way lacy ran like a mad man would have left no doubt in anyone's mind he would have come to this situation.
It's a filter fellas...granted he hasn't slimmed down, but he isn't that gray.
At least I'm assuming it is...or hoping.....LOL
yup. pretty funny though.At least I'm assuming it is...or hoping.....LOL