digsthepack
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 2,486
- Reaction score
- 0
Heaven forbid they develop an unhealthy attraction to foliage...save the children from the green, blooming demon that is shrubbery!
Obi1 said:Why is it that another Reggie Bush post is allowed on to and discussed on this forum?
When I started one it was moved to the official Bush thread?
I don't get it.
Obi1 said:Why is it that another Reggie Bush post is allowed on to and discussed on this forum?
When I started one it was moved to the official Bush thread?
I don't get it.
musccy said:Obi1 said:Why is it that another Reggie Bush post is allowed on to and discussed on this forum?
When I started one it was moved to the official Bush thread?
I don't get it.
Shhhhhh....don't mention "that name" I think it's because the thread evolved and hasn't had a chance to be moved yet...although, if you notice, digs and I were talking about green thumbs, not about you know who from you know where.
net said:The NFL draft is five months away.
The Reggie Bush talk is all horse****. Why?
1)Reggie Bush is a junior. As of today, he hasn't declared his decision whether to give up his senior year. If you recall his teammate Leinert gave up a sure top pick #1 selection last year to return for his senior year.
So to say he's going to be the #1 is premature. In fact, Pete Carroll is pissed at the media for saying it's a done deal that he's coming out.
2)It assumes the Packers aren't going to win anymore games and Houston, Jets, San Fran are all ahead of Green Bay in draft order as of today...WITH FOUR WEEKS TO GO. By the way, reports out of Houston say the Texans would take either Bush or Lienart, as Carr likely will be released rather than pay him an 8 million bonus, and the running back they recently signed wouldn't be an impediment to ALSO signing Bush. (Pro Football Talk)
3)It also assumes that Tightwad Ted Thompson would want to keep the pick. There's many good running backs available this year and Tightwad Ted might think we'll take the #2 guy if they could pick up some other good players.
If Bush fell into the Packers laps(if all the if's and buts become candy and nuts) they would snap him up in an instant, but to wring hands over getting Bush is really out there at this point.
TOPackerFan said:If we don't have a shot at Bush (and maybe even if we do considering what someone may give up to get him) I really hope we trade down to a late top 10 pick (assuming we stay at #3, 4 or 5). The extra second round and late second day pick this will net us will be invaluable in contributing to our overall depth (remember what the Giants gave up to get Manning and the players the Charges were able to obtain as a result of moving down three slots).
Philtration said:TOPackerFan said:If we don't have a shot at Bush (and maybe even if we do considering what someone may give up to get him) I really hope we trade down to a late top 10 pick (assuming we stay at #3, 4 or 5). The extra second round and late second day pick this will net us will be invaluable in contributing to our overall depth (remember what the Giants gave up to get Manning and the players the Charges were able to obtain as a result of moving down three slots).
If they have a shot at Bush you take him in a heartbeat. Trading down usually means two lesser players instead of the one great player.
The Bears trade down and draft Cade McNown instead of Culpepper.
The Bears trade down and draft Grossman and Haynes instead of Leftwhich.
You put either one of these QBs on the Bears right now and they probably go to the Super Bowl this year. Go with the impact player.
IPBprez said:I like the "what if" conversation, even if NET thinks it's a bit premature...
On the radio this morning - Steve Czaban says the Pack are currently listed third on Draft Day.
Houston has two (supposedly) easy games against the Niners and then Tennessee.
We just have to watch where the Jets land... (no pun intended)
Philtration said:If they have a shot at Bush you take him in a heartbeat. Trading down usually means two lesser players instead of the one great player.
The Bears trade down and draft Cade McNown instead of Culpepper.
The Bears trade down and draft Grossman and Haynes instead of Leftwhich.
You put either one of these QBs on the Bears right now and they probably go to the Super Bowl this year. Go with the impact player.
Bobby Roberts said:GB is actually in a good situation right now.
Walker and Murphy will return next season, meaning we should be ok at WR. Gado continues to improve behind a poor OL and Herron will get a chance as well. We still need to draft or pickup another RB, but not necessarily in round 1. Our TEs are the strength of our offense right now. It would be very difficult to find a better trio.
On defense Collins and Roman continue to improve and gel. Poppinga and Manning are improving quickly, while Thomas is doing great. Barnett needs to be more consistent. Carroll is correcting mistakes and becoming a solid CB while Harris is a stud. Our DL is gelling with plenty of young guys stepping up.
Big loses to come are Green, Davenport and Jackson. We need to replace Jackson in the middle. We also need to continue to improve our depth.
In the end, our draft needs lead to first getting more than 5 picks. TT knows this and has noted that we will have more than 5 picks. He made some good trades last April to get a few extra guys and we know he'll do the same again.
So if we have a top 5 spot come April 2006, it is only logical that TT will trade down to pick up more players and get a top 15 pick.
CaliforniaCheez said:Only 12 Sherman draft picks remain on the team with Nall soon to leave and Washington not likely to make it in 06. If Ted Thompson can get rid of Martin I wouldn't mind so Sherman's draft picks on the team gets into single digits next year.
The 12(one for each day of Christmas) are:
01
Ferguson
Martin
02
Walker
Kampmann (free agent)
Nall (free agent)
03
Barnett
Peterson
04
Carroll
Washington
Sander
Williams
Wells (cut but signed again)
8 of Wolf's picks are still around. 10 of Thompson's are sitll around.
Any bets on more of Wolf's draft picks being around during 06 than Sherman's???
The jury is still out on Benson and I did not think that they needed a running back in the first place but Angelo is a moron. Angelo wanted to trade down and no one wanted to make a move.all about da packers said:Philtration said:TOPackerFan said:If we don't have a shot at Bush (and maybe even if we do considering what someone may give up to get him) I really hope we trade down to a late top 10 pick (assuming we stay at #3, 4 or 5). The extra second round and late second day pick this will net us will be invaluable in contributing to our overall depth (remember what the Giants gave up to get Manning and the players the Charges were able to obtain as a result of moving down three slots).
If they have a shot at Bush you take him in a heartbeat. Trading down usually means two lesser players instead of the one great player.
The Bears trade down and draft Cade McNown instead of Culpepper.
The Bears trade down and draft Grossman and Haynes instead of Leftwhich.
You put either one of these QBs on the Bears right now and they probably go to the Super Bowl this year. Go with the impact player.
Hey Phil.... lets not forget...
The Bears stay where they are and draft Cedric Benson. :lol: