OldSchool101
Pack
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 15,814
- Reaction score
- 6,773
At veteran minimum! Hell yeah!I had a dream last night that Rodgers stayed in Green Bay and Bortles beat him out for the starting job!
Blake Bortles to Packers on 1 year deal
- Thread starter C-Lee
- Start date
RicFlairoftheNFL
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2016
- Messages
- 1,372
- Reaction score
- 280
Wasn't this the game where McMahon came in cause Favre took a shot in the gut then McMahon proceeded to trip and choke on his chaw and blow his lunch all over the 5 yard line?
Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Half Empty
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,545
- Reaction score
- 658
MLF stated early on that he wants to build this offense to become a run-heavy **** & dunk type of offense for the cold weather and playoff games. It would suit Love's style perfectly and before Love was drafted I called it on Reddit that he would be picked by us based upon MLF's comments on the Packers' future.
This is the main reason why I believe Rodgers wants out - he knows what is going on.
GreenBaySlacker
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,103
- Reaction score
- 213
Now we have a backup for when we trade love....
Interesting. I didn't think it was an opinion though, I thought they had solid plans for this sort of thing. I mean they would just have to finish a game, and they'd find someone during the week I'm sure for the next game. But I thought they'd have plans. I seem to recall one of the announcers saying JK Scott was the emergency quarterback for the Packers, either last season or the one before, but I may be remembering wrong.
I've always thought we could benefit from a move the chains type of offense, but you still have to be able to take a shot down the field now and then. I don't know if Rodgers has the patience to run a ****-and-dunk.
Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Kurt Benkert was signed today, so now we have a backup to Bortles and Love.
RicFlairoftheNFL
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2016
- Messages
- 1,372
- Reaction score
- 280
Tells me everything I need to know about Chad Kelly's head and his chances in the NFL.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2013
- Messages
- 6,682
- Reaction score
- 1,967
I never saw that or heard that. Sounds like McMahon though.
I hope they never have to use him because Rodgers is coming back
Ha ha!! Love it! Maybe they should bring Brett back to! Lol
Interesting, thanks. Makes sense that a lot of these guys played multi-position, or started in one place and ended in another. Regardless, it's good to know there's a non-QB on the team that can take a snap. And the way things are going this year, who knows?
PackAttack12
R-E-L-A-X
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2016
- Messages
- 6,500
- Reaction score
- 2,157
This was a no brainer for the Packers:
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Half Empty
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,545
- Reaction score
- 658
Better than some of the moves they've made that were apparently done without using brains. 
OldSchool101
Pack
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 15,814
- Reaction score
- 6,773
We warned him.., Do NOT eat the “Horse Collar 22” Kielbasa with beer cheese” that close to game-time. It was completely up to him that he didn’t take us seriously. He was a Loner that kid
Mia
Cheesehead
I agree with this, if Rogers is a no show or traded, Love is going to need a veteran to help him along. I will still love the packers
Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Should have kept Blake in Green Bay for the several thousands of dollars it would have cost.....he's a Saint now! At least maybe he will be available when the Saints miss the playoffs.
www.nola.com
The Saints have landed a veteran QB to back up Ian Book vs. the Dolphins, sources say
The New Orleans Saints are expected to sign quarterback Blake Bortles due to the team's ongoing COVID-19 outbreak, sources informed the Times-Picayune on Friday.
Pkrjones
Cheesehead
GB already has 3 QB's, no need for a 4th who won't see any playing time on a ravaged NO squad. If we're ever down to Benkert starting the team's chances aren't very good, anyway, unless it's a Mac Jones-esque 3 pass game.
Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
I would take Bortles in a pinch over any of the current Packer backups. But that's just me thinking a Vet has the edge in running an offense in a situation where they are suddenly pressed into duty.
D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
It seems you're putting way too much stock into Bortles being a veteran instead of taking a look at his performance at the pro level.
While I don't believe Love or Benkert would be able to successfully run the Packers' offense I highly doubt Bortles would be either.
Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
So instead of putting Stock in what Bortles has done at the Pro Level, you are suggesting that I put stock in what Love and Benkert have done?
I agree with captain on this one. I do not think Bortles played a second in the pre-season and I do not believe you need your second hand to count the number of snaps he took in practice. If he had anything at all left they would have given him more of a look. He was and is nothing more than a cheap vet in an extreme emergency. IMO.
Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
To be honest, I don't think any of those 3 options (Bortles, Love, Benkert) are going to win a playoff game for the Packers. However, I still would prefer a seasoned vet that is familiar with the Packers offense, over either of the Packers current backups.
The Packer obviously disagree with my opinion, since they have signed and released Bortles twice now.
I am hoping we get to see what he has in the Saints game tomorrow.
Last edited:
Similar threads
