Reminds me of the one (and only) time I forgot to remove my wife's bra from the laundry before drying it.That kid gets yanked and banged around more than a yo yo string caught in the lint basket of a front load dryer
Reminds me of the one (and only) time I forgot to remove my wife's bra from the laundry before drying it.That kid gets yanked and banged around more than a yo yo string caught in the lint basket of a front load dryer
Ouch, did she bang her head a lot inside the dryer?Reminds me of the one (and only) time I forgot to remove my wife's bra from the laundry before drying it.
Fulgham is out as expected.
Goodson, while I do want him on the PS to grow and learn, isn't ready. Winfree, another PS type player is just that. These guys are practice players. If they would be looking at them playing an active role on their roster they are rough shape. I'd say Heflin might make an impact. The other two, not so much. Just my opinion and I do like the overall Packers roster as well.Why would that mean their roster is in rough shape? All three are guys some/many of us were hoping would be on the Packer's Final 53... and I'm very impressed with the Packer Roster (with the exceptions of TE & OLB backups).
Agree. Winfree is your typical JAG WR, that we have seen and had plenty of over the years. I doubt anyone picks Toure up, but I would prefer protecting him, over Winfree. Fresh, younger guy. Only so many years you can give a guy to break into playing and Winfree didn't seem to get there. Toure probably won't either, but next man up and give him a chance.Goodson, while I do want him on the PS to grow and learn, isn't ready. Winfree, another PS type player is just that. These guys are practice players. If they would be looking at them playing an active role on their roster they are rough shape. I'd say Heflin might make an impact. The other two, not so much. Just my opinion and I do like the overall Packers roster as well.
Was thinking the same thing, especially if Crosby is iffy on being ready by the Viking game. If Ahmed is kicking well, hell, they might find someone willing to give up a 5th or 6th for him, 4 weeks into the season. Doubt it, but at least they can protect him on the PS and not expose him to waivers.I'm honestly at this point leaning leave Crosby on PUP, Keep Ahmed for certain here for the beginning of the season - you can then activate Crosby after letting him come back slow and no rush. PS Ahmed and be one of the protected ones ensuring a kicker we like is always in house.
Also would mean we just need four more cuts.
Seems cold, but I'm ready to move on from Crosby. He's had his day in the sun and has a ring to show for it. Time to ride off into the sunset.I'm honestly at this point leaning leave Crosby on PUP, Keep Ahmed for certain here for the beginning of the season - you can then activate Crosby after letting him come back slow and no rush. PS Ahmed and be one of the protected ones ensuring a kicker we like is always in house.
Also would mean we just need four more cuts.
Was thinking the same thing, especially if Crosby is iffy on being ready by the Viking game. If Ahmed is kicking well, hell, they might find someone willing to give up a 5th or 6th for him, 4 weeks into the season. Doubt it, but at least they can protect him on the PS and not expose him to waivers.
I'd put money on Wilborn being one for sure. Then it gets tough....a S, an OLB and maybe Toure, Jones or Ford.At the moment, assuming Hill & Crosby on PUP, we're at 57...
Last 4 cuts come down to any combination of the following:
WR's: Toure
OL's: Walker, Jones
OLB's: Galeai, Garvin, Jones
DL: Ford
ILB: Wilborn
S: Abernathy, Leavitt, Carpenter
C'mon, Tyni!! Lowry, Nijman, or Crosby?*the tidbit piece is that GB has been in some trade discussions today. He hinted at what player but didn't directly say so I won't speculate.
Are they finally trading Aaron Rodgers?*the tidbit piece is that GB has been in some trade discussions today. He hinted at what player but didn't directly say so I won't speculate.