What a terrible precedent to set. Want to vent about the loss and express concerns about the QB? Well sir, you had better have happened to have shown some enthusiasm and posted after the latest win, or you're gone.
Only if the devil dies and he isnt sick
Well it's not always easy to detect online.
Why not ****ing ask?
www.acmepackingcompany.com
Bart Starr did not have a lot of signs/ metrics that he was going to get better even after the 1959 season. Lombardi liked the fact that he was a good student. But it was not until several games into the 1960 season that he put lasting faith in #15.I know we want to believe otherwise, but there are not a lot of signs/metrics that suggest that Jordan Love is just going to get better. I hope he does, obviously.
Jordan Love’s recent struggles are significant warning signs
Through five weeks, he does not look like "The Guy."
I would hope that that’s the case here, too, but at the same time we’re more or less hanging our hopes on Love being the exception rather than the rule. There are far fewer Starrs, Josh Allens, etc than the alternative.
Good point/questions. It's way too soon to evaluate Love. The OL has been porous and on a lot of plays, Love has less than 3 seconds to do something. Very evident in the Lions' game 1H. Kinda hard to run through check downs in that time.
My knee-jerk reaction would be that it's really not his 4th year in the system, as that term would normally be implied. Lack of even practice snaps during that time is a mitigating factor, and he's had basically no live-fire snaps prior to this year. I would have to think that he's been able to throw well during whatever episodes in camp and practice he's had, only because if it's THAT basic, there would have been changes or at least talk about changes. Never played the game, but I have to think that accuracy IS something that could be fixed with repetition - just like footwork or progressions.
If we build a team like SF I could play quarterback.
Nah, I commented on the wins too. Not sure I require a ban for joking around. If that’s the decision, I guess so be it.
I don’t only comment after losses though. Frustrated after the last loss & just pointing out that I don’t think Love is the man. I think I raise some good points & add value to discussions. If that’s not the case, feel free to ban me.
As I said elsewhere, the team was convinced enough by what they saw from Rodgers to commit to him long-term by October 31 of that season.
It's sarcasm
Could beat the Bears again, we'll be at home. A lot depends on if Aaron Jones is going to be healthy or if that hamstring is going to be a nagging problem all season. Without him, there's considerably more reason for pessimism. Or maybe optimism, if you're looking for better draft picks.
Wolf certainly had a very good track record with picking QB talent.
Bear game is WK 18? Both teams will be playing back ups to the back ups. Anything could happen. But what IS certain about that game. It will be BRRRRRR!
Yeah that's very likely gonna be two teams playing for nothing more than to get the season over and get someplace warm. And at that point, what's another win or loss anyway?
Battle for a draft spot?
Certainly a possibility, although I do think the Packers will win 6 or 7 games while the Bears may be stuck at 1. I guess that would give the Packers a pick somewhere around #10? Not really sure.
Words have meaning, and reading is fundamental. It IS that straight forward.
