2022 NFL Live Draft thread

[Schultz]

Hey Beard. Hopefully Cine is available at 53.

 

[tynimiller]

Breaking news Rodgers just retired

Contrary he has been explaining why it isn’t always right or shocking not to take a WR on Pat McaFee

 

[longtimefan]

Don’t argue with the fake fans. They will twist and turn everything in their heads to justify anything the Packers do.

Us with a normal functioning brain can never comprehend what happens in their minds.

OK thats it

Stop blasting those that disagree

Next time your on a month long time out

 

[rmontro]

Yeah, potentially they're putting together one heck of a defense.

They freaking well better be.

 

[Arod2gjdd]

Georgia North

 

[PackerDNA]

I don't think he will be. But then again, I gave it about zero chance that Wyatt would be available at number 28.

 

[KiDcUdI]

24 year old rookie. I’ve seen that backfire so many times. He’s in his male physical prime playing against boys. Not a fan.

 

[kevans74]

To be fair, probably only 2 out of the 6 WRs selected so far in the 1st will pan out to anything.....

Looks like we can go 2nd round WR, FA vet WR like Julio, AJ, Fuller, Sanders, etc

Defense wins championships

 

[McKnowledge]

Looks like for sure we will sign Julio, AJ, Sanders, Fuller, etc one of those guys and WR in 2nd round

Watson, Pierce, Pickens and maybe Tolbert are gone if Packers don't move up in the 2nd round.

This draft is unpredictable.

 

[Jayzee1981]

Ex

24 year old rookie. I’ve seen that backfire so many times. He’s in his male physical prime playing against boys. Not a fan.

of course you’re not

 

[longtimefan]

Beginning to realize that Gute believes the 2000 Ravens were the height of football and he’s trying to recreate it while also not being willing to let the gravy train (Rodgers) walk.

Gonna need to improve that defense with a passing offense featuring fewer open receivers than any other team in the NFL.

 

[Pkrjones]

Good night Packer fans!! I'm calling my shot 22 hours early- Alec Pierce -WR.

 

[PackerDNA]

I don't think Cine will be. But then again, I gave it about zero chance that Wyatt would be available at number 28.

 

[gatorpack]

LMAO some people here would argue with their reflection

 

[ThePerfectBeard]

Hey Beard. Hopefully Cine is available at 53.

I will root for all my Dawgs, but I kind of want Dax Hill more. Give me Pickens in the second and I won't know what to do with my hands. Pipe dream for sure, but IDK. Let's GO!

 

[Arod2gjdd]

You must be logged in to see this image or video!

Okay, so in the very first play of this reel he has a Kenny Clark like effort play, never giving up and chasing the QB down from behind.

I'm in.

 

[Cornelius Weems]

And another defensive pick.... You lose so many receivers, SW is not a #1 WR. AR got signed with ZERO #1 wideouts, I honestly question if they have a honest #2, I don't follow this thought process.

 

[Firethorn1001]

Like the picks.

Obviously disappointed no WR (yet) however, I think the writing was on the wall that there was going to be a run from 8-18ish and that the potential was always there that they wouldn't get a WR til 2nd round unless they traded up. They walk out of tomorrow with 1 (or 2) of Watson, Moore, Pickens, Metchie, Pierce, Tolbert.. I'm happy.

 

[Jayzee1981]

Love the picks

Agreed. I said the last 2 months go D 1st round and look at this. We can have an elite defense and still there is much talent at WR

 

[Sanguine camper]

The Secondary is maybe the best in football. ILB is the best in many years with Campbell and now Walker. Gute added Reed and now Wyat to help out Clark. I'm "Stoked" about this defense!!! Tired about reading about wide receivers. Packers can run the ball and play defense. WR isn't that important.

 

[Sunshinepacker]

Of course it is

You feel rodgers does no wrongn

Nope. I just recognize that he’s the best at his job and giving him the worst receiving group in the nfl doesn’t seem, uh, like a good idea?

 

[Sunshinepacker]

Rogers isn’t throwing to rookies. He said as much.

And?

 

[swhitset]

Because he won back to back mvps after the love pick

This statement ^^^^^ is factually right

Thats a fact..

I’m trying to figure out if you are being intentionally obtuse… or if you truly don’t understand…that his original statement.. you know the one that you keep quoting only part of ... had a point. Go back to my corn flake example if you are really missing the point … although I find that hard to believe. For the record … we all know that Rodgers had back to back MVPs … His CLAIM was that drafting love was the cause. That was and is an opinion… this really isn’t that hard… and I’ve said all I care to about it at this point.

 

[longtimefan]

Nope. I just recognize that he’s the best at his job and giving him the worst receiving group in the nfl doesn’t seem, uh, like a good idea?

Crystal ball?

Lets bet. The gb wr wont be worse wr group..

How do we set the parameters?

Use wr, te and rb stats?

And if they are you admit you know nothing a out nfl?

If they are ill admit I know even less?

 

[KiDcUdI]

OK thats it

Stop blasting those that disagree

Next time your on a month long time out

If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine