Woodson on offense

[DePack]

I think the main point is to have a guy that the other team doesn't include in their gameplan. They aren't going to spend time talking about how to stop Woodson as a reciever. It is a change of pace thing. Opposing teams are going to know the strengths and weaknesses of our normal wideouts, but with Woodson, it will be all new. Like others have been saying, he won't be used often, just every once in awhile to shake things up.

No no no....I think Chicago should prepare for Woodson at wideout, Barnett at running back and my favorite Grady Jackson at QB!!

 

[retiredgrampa]

Hell, I'm all for it! One of our many weaknesses last year was lack of imagination, tunnelvision. With the weakness at WR, (BTW, I expect Gardner to surprise many) this could be a help. My only reservation is the possibility of injury. We can't afford ANY of that this year...and the football gods owe us that.

 

[porky88]

IF he does it'll be for a decoy or a screen... Nothing big.. Maybe 3 plays a game at tops..

 

[bozz_2006]

tops! and i bet the amount of offensive plays that he is in on wains durning the second half of hte year.

 

[porky88]

You don't take an injury prone CB and put him at WR.