signing people to spend money isn't a good strategy, especially when we have a lot of people up next year and carrying over some cap money will come in handy for one. 2nd, I don't think there are any teams that are clearly more talented than GB. I think we're up there in terms of talent, some are injured, some aren't playing up to par, they're figuring things out and are still 6-1. They certainly don't have the best player at every position, but then no team does, nor will they.
Really? I can name multiple that I believe are very clearly more talented... In fact I was thinking about this while watching the Bengals game last night how stacked they are at so many positions. Benard/Hill/Eifert/Green/Sanu/Jones. Thats 6 big time weapons just on offense. Without Dalton. Their defense is FAR superior to ours. So not sure how you can say you don't see any other teams that with more talent.
I would say overall Denver is more talented as well. New England for sure. Their Defense is far superior athletically. And offense with gronk. edelman, lewis, blunt. brady is every bit as good.
And honestly I think you could argue for quite a few other teams being more talented. The Packers defense whether anyone wants to believe it or not is HORRENDOUS. Take Matthews out and you don't have a playmaker at all. Clinton-Dix drops interceptions like its his job, Burnett can't stay healthy or tackle worth crap. Our corners, look solid against bad teams and get exploited in hard match ups. Front 7 doesn't show up in many games. If this defense ranks in the top 20 at the end of the season i would be surprised. They are bad fundamentally... Lack talent, athleticism, and attitude.