No topic is unworthy of discussion, it`s a discussion forum .
I do. She had 14 kids. 3 sets of twins. So...no balls. Farm girl breeding stock.
anywhere but London I would stop being a fan. Unless it was a cool place that didn't have much of a sports culture. Portland Packers I could get behind.
Okay. I think instead of F-18s and Apache helicopters for flyovers next year, the Packers should look into some flyovers by dragons and griffins. Thoughts?No topic is unworthy of discussion, it`s a discussion forum .
Okay. I think instead of F-18s and Apache helicopters for flyovers next year, the Packers should look into some flyovers by dragons and griffins. Thoughts?
Are both subjects not in the realm of fantasy? BTW I never claimed to be attractive.Sarcasm is so unattractive . If people want to talk about something within reason, it`s a discussion forum. thoughts ?
Are both subjects not in the realm of fantasy? BTW I never claimed to be attractive.
LOL....I`m sure you are. attractive I mean. It`s just that it is worth discussing. It`s highly unlikely, but as somebody else said the stadium is relatively small to host a Superbowl. I personally love Green Bay the city, and the people too, but as a business, anything is possible. I`m not trying to start a fight here, I`m just saying the subject isn`t beyond discussion.
I believe it is far more likely to see Aaron Rodgers get struck by lighting at the exact moment of him throwing an interception that any scenario of the Packers moving out of Green Bay. Both notions are absolutely ridiculous.
And so do I, but never say never. Your serve I believe.
Moving the Packers to another city would require the use of an infinite improbability drive, and I don't believe one exists on this planet. I rest my case, sir!
That's a time machine. That's different.You obviously don`t watch "Timeless"
That's a time machine. That's different.
Well said.The Green Bay Packers, Inc. are a unique corporation structureXUB RGEW nfl. The apckers arepubicaly owned non profit corp[oration. Tehj pakcesa are they only franchise in the nfl with this corprfoate structure. The NFL now longer allows this tyuop=ep of ownership in the nNFL. The n=NFL only alow an owner or aPRTENRSHIP
Alot of discussion around the current affairs of the Packers. Rightfully so. With that said, I wanted to change gears a bit. The Chargers left San Diego. The Rams have left a few cities. How would you react if the Packers left for somewhere else. Remain a fan? Follow the new team? Huge hypothetical that's likely not gonna happen. Curious.
Sure they can. I don't know of any restrictions on where the home games are played. Lambeau Field gets worn out in 20 years and Milwaukee makes a pitch with a $2.6b domed stadium???The way owned you pretty much can't
Sure they can. I don't know of any restrictions on where the home games are played.
You conveniently omitted the 20 year time frame I put in my post. Also leases always seem to have an out clause.The Packers lease at Lambeau Field runs through the 2032 season therefore the team can't play anywhere else before that.