Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 786869" data-attributes="member: 10247">The Bears are more than one man on defense.  I think the combination of the "not different" play calling and the fact that Mack and Smith were on second half play counts (and got wore down like the rest of the D did when not able to substitute due to the "not different" play calling.)  They are not as good as the vikings but they are more of a team than just one man. I wouldn't say Cook/Murray are better than Howard/Cohen.  Cook may be better than both Bears backs but I'd say both Bears backs are better than Murray.  QB and WR yeah, the vikings get the nod.Using stats from one game to prove one player is better than another.  Come on man, I thought you were smarter than that.  Cousins may not put up better numbers over the course of a season than Keenum did last year because like you said Keenum played out of his mind but I think Cousins will be a more steady and reliable QB.  There will be less of a chance for him to lay an egg if you will.  Even with Rodgers it will be a difficult test and I think you are right, it will come down to our D-line Vs their O-line  If we can pressure Cousins and slow down Cook Rodgers will have a shot.Ties never happen in the NFL <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Total: 164 (members: 4, guests: 160)