Voyageur
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2021
- Messages
- 2,887
- Reaction score
- 2,378
I ain't no Clyde Beatty either!I learned a long time ago to not trust the Lions.
I ain't no Clyde Beatty either!I learned a long time ago to not trust the Lions.
I learned a long time ago to not trust the Lions.
Aside from that other than our last 2 SB wins and the Bears in 1985 there are no crowns coming out of our 4 teams since the 60's. None of us can boast compared to some other franchises in the modern era.I doubt that there is a non-Packer fan base in the NFC, especially the 3 fan bases in the NFC North, that wouldn't love to see the Packers struggle mightily for the next....30 years. Which simply means, the Packers have been envied by a lot of fans, because of their success over the last 30 years. While I don't see the Packers winning a lot of games this season, I don't foresee them going back to being the Packers of the 70's and 80's either.
I don't disagree with any of that. However, I've seen year in and year out when the Lions are supposed to be good and never are. I'm going with that they are going to disappoint those that think they will be good. It's what they do.Who said trust them? You have to ignore trends, projections off of last year, roster changes/additions and the state of the rest of the division to not see the Lions are clearly at worst tied for most likely to win the NFC North.
I don't disagree with any of that. However, I've seen year in and year out when the Lions are supposed to be good and never are. I'm going with that they are going to disappoint those that think they will be good. It's what they do.
They really came to play. 4 of those early losses were very winnable. They win one or two more and they were in the postseason. It may only take 10 wins to take our division.I don't disagree with any of that. However, I've seen year in and year out when the Lions are supposed to be good and never are. I'm going with that they are going to disappoint those that think they will be good. It's what they do.
They should have beat Seattle last year. And maybe opening week is the best time to get the Chiefs. Do not count them out.They start off with @KC and vsSEA. If that's 0-2, I'm not quite sounding the alarms yet.
I felt the same with Lewis last year. Beyond a couple well designed plays to get him the ball, he was not an offensive threat at all. I've never thought much of Davis beyond a backup if every other TE gets hurt.I don't get the seeming Tyler Davis love from the powers that be/coaches. He has really not showed me much. The coaching staff puts too much emphasis imho on blocking from a should be offensive weapon. Teach it but don't confuse it with production. I'll probably get to see if he gets better this year. If he starts over Kraft because he can block better...that's just nuts.
I'll give you this, the Lions have a pretty soft schedule this year, especially given that the Packers are in a mini-rebuild and the Bears are still building. Their 2 toughest opponents are the Chiefs and maybe Dallas.They start off with @KC and vsSEA. If that's 0-2, I'm not quite sounding the alarms yet.
I still doubt that happens. However if we can just get an above average starter that gets a 3rd contract I’d be elated. I’ll take 40 years of play across a span of just 3 QB’sLol. Well. I learned early on as a Lions fan to not talk trash since I play no role in backing it up.
I guess we'll see if Love makes it 45 straight years of HoF QB play.
I can see that. Poached from Indianapolis via Jaguars. Tyler is the second most tenured TE on our roster. I agree in an ordinary scenario he’s the odd man out had we kept either Tonyan or Lewis. Tyler is at that point he knows that playbook well and his blocking assignments also. It would be dangerous to let him go and then have an injury to Deguara. We would literally have zero tenure at TE across the entire room, which would leave us a little vulnerable.I don't get the seeming Tyler Davis love from the powers that be/coaches. He has really not showed me much. The coaching staff puts too much emphasis imho on blocking from a should be offensive weapon. Teach it but don't confuse it with production. I'll probably get to see if he gets better this year. If he starts over Kraft because he can block better...that's just nuts.
That just does not bother me. Keeping him means leaving someone else off. Can he still go on practice squad. Because nobody is going to take him from us...I don't think or would care.I can see that. However, Tyler is the second most tenured TE on our roster. I agree in an ordinary scenario he’s the odd man out had we kept either Tonyan or Lewis. Tyler is at that point he knows that playbook well and his blocking assignments also. It would be dangerous to let him go and then have an injury to Deguara. We would literally have zero tenure at TE across the entire room.
That just does not bother me. Keeping him means leaving someone else off. Can he still go on practice squad. Because nobody is going to take him from us...I don't think or would care.
So we need 4 TEs? Well, if Davis can show more than he has...then OK. If he is taking away snaps from someone else and not performing well; then it's a negative. I honestly don't know why they like him. I've seen him not do well on blocking assignments and drop passes. And I look forward to our two headed monster. Kraft and Musgrave. I hope that is part of our arsenal.No it doesn't? Keeping Davis isn't costing Kraft, Musgrave or Deguara a spot. We don't have anyone else unless McDonald all of a sudden starts popping that is even close to fighting for a TE spot that keeping Davis would cost us.
I typed my answer in late.So we need 4 TEs? Well, if Davis can show more than he has...then OK. If he is taking away snaps from someone else and not performing well; then it's a negative. I honestly don't know why they like him. I've seen him not do well on blocking assignments and drop passes. And I look forward to our two headed monster. Kraft and Musgrave. I hope that is part of our arsenal.
McDonald was cut a week ago.We don't have anyone else unless McDonald all of a sudden starts popping that is even close to fighting for a TE spot
Someone has to win the division. And the Vikings will be pressed to win all those close ones this year again while the Lions could be better enough to win them.I'll give you this, the Lions have a pretty soft schedule this year, especially given that the Packers are in a mini-rebuild and the Bears are still building. Their 2 toughest opponents are the Chiefs and maybe Dallas.
McDonald was cut a week ago.
Barring an injury, Degaura makes the 53. His experience as an H-Back will be the reason for it. I hope he adds receiving to his plus side. Given that he will be a Free Agent after this season, his staying with the Packers beyond 2023 might come down to him improving on what we have seen to date.
So we need 4 TEs? Well, if Davis can show more than he has...then OK. If he is taking away snaps from someone else and not performing well; then it's a negative. I honestly don't know why they like him. I've seen him not do well on blocking assignments and drop passes. And I look forward to our two headed monster. Kraft and Musgrave. I hope that is part of our arsenal.
I thought I saw him listed as a FB on the depth chart. I believe there are 7 roster spots between TE and RBs available on the 53. Davis is not in competition with other TEs but with a 3rd back and 7th WR. I think that Leavitt may be on thin ice as Owens is now practicing at his spot as the personal protector for the punter.Barring an injury, Degaura makes the 53. His experience as an H-Back will be the reason for it.
I have seen Deguara listed either as a TE or FB on varying Depth charts. On the Packers.com page he is listed as a FB on the depth chart and a TE on their roster. Tomato, Tomatoe, doesn't matter, as far as the final 53, he counts as a roster spot either way.I thought I saw him listed as a FB on the depth chart. I believe there are 7 roster spots between TE and RBs available on the 53. Davis is not in competition with other TEs but with a 3rd back and 7th WR. I think that Leavitt may be on thin ice as Owens is now practicing at his spot as the personal protector for the punter.