OldSchool101
Pack
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 15,936
- Reaction score
- 6,860
Yep. Gute has been pretty successful in the draft overall with just a few misses. If he keeps on that path through 2024 we’re going to be well stocked. He’ll also be able to ease back into FA as early as next season. If Jordan pans out? the Packers can spend draft and FA resources surrounding him and plugging upgrades on DefenseThe Raiders (Davante Adams) and a few other teams keep making that same mistake. They aren't SB contenders and they go out and trade draft assets and tie up a lot of money, for 1 single player, thinking it is the missing piece to a SB.
I hope the Packers are competitive in 2023, but giving away high draft assets and tying up a ton of cap on a Safety, isn't my way of building a very young team for the future.
Gute has been playing it pretty smart so far. He turned a very aging team into a very young one in less than a year. IF his last few years of draft picks pay off AND Love is legit, this team could make another long run of dominating the NFC North and NFC in general.
On a side note. As far as draft success and how that affects our roster. Gutey traded around the board and still landed J’aire plus a future Day 1 selection. When I look at a full spectrum of draft moves that’s a bonus selection imo. I’ve seen some others (not you) eluding to our GM spending or missing, but not accurately reflecting on the true value spent. Our GM essentially used a 3rd Rounder to get that extra Day 1 pick the following season. So in effect, we can apply that as a 3rd Round expenditure, not a Day1. We wouldn’t have had it unless he made the initial trade to get J’aire and gyrated down and back up. I think draft trades need to be factored into each draft grade and when we don’t do that it’s grading improperly overall. It’s not just in this forum it’s propagated from Professional Sports Analysts and other media who’ve not put very good thought into a draft grading system. Then after a few years they forget the intricacies of the moves and grade in knee jerk fashion. Yes, we need to hold Gute accountable on Reed using a #45 overall, but we also got 2 bonus Day3 selections and should factor all three of those together in our future eval.
#45 was used in combination for J. Reed+D. Wicks+ Karl Brooks. They’ll factor a miss on Reed, but not a future Probowl appearance by Wicks as a hypothetical.
If we keep massaging the draft board to get more swings like we have since 2018 + clicking along pretty successful in FA moves?
as you said… we’ll be really stout by 2024-2025 imo. I do expect a temporary, slight regression during the 2023 season though.
Last edited: