PackAttack12
R-E-L-A-X
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2016
- Messages
- 6,500
- Reaction score
- 2,157
4 of the 5 removed from the injury report. We good.Tis obvious they have issues......with the coaching staff....see all the knee problems???
4 of the 5 removed from the injury report. We good.Tis obvious they have issues......with the coaching staff....see all the knee problems???
I dont think you understood.4 of the 5 removed from the injury report. We good.
Or just leave the "fairy" stuff out of it and find a word for "brittle" that rhymes with "Perry".He may pull a hammy if I run away from him
Seattle Injury Report:Injury report:
Out:
Randall Cobb (hamstring)
Kevin King (hamstring)
Nick Perry (knee)
Kentrell Brice (ankle)
Questionable:
Blake Martinez (ankle)
Bashaud Breeland (groin)
Doubtful:
Lucas Patrick (concussion)
Removed from injury report:
Aaron Rodgers (knee)
Jimmy Graham (knee)
David Bakhtiari (knee)
Bryan Bulaga (knee)
Perry does not drink Dairy!.....equals brittle!Or just leave the "fairy" stuff out of it and find a word for "brittle" that rhymes with "Perry".
Though not rhymes, hear are a couple that are alliterative if not particulary artful:
Perishing Perry
Powdery Perry (though that's kinda what you want to avoid)
Pulverizeable Perry
Or we could just go with injury prone.
They are second in attempts and average nearly 5 per run without a dominant "lead back" type of guy. This tells me they aren't gaining these yards by simply running the ball every play rather being efficient in their attack. I would say that makes them a pretty darn good run blocking team. I watched Chris Carson play in person on numerous occasions and he is no Pro Bowl caliber RB. He was buried on the depth chart during much of his time in Stillwater. He is a nice enough player but the run blocking has allowed him to flourish as much as he has.
Though this game is huge for the Packers as well, even with a loss, they could bounce back against the Vikes and be right back in the thick of the division race.
Absolutely not, the contract TT gave him was ludicrous.
Hindsight only you say? What were his stats prior to that 1 season? Here they are from 2011-2013 over those 3 seasons combined he had 136 receptions for 1762 yards and 13 tds. So on average, leading up to the contract year that you pointed out, he had 45 catches, 587 yards and 4 tds per year. About the same production we have gotten out of him since. Only time he has produced anything above average was in a contract year. I am not convinced 1 above average season puts a guy in nfl elite status but for you and TT it apparently does.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that when healthy Randall Cobb is an average nfl receiver.You completely ignore two things.
First of all Cobb didn't play a lot during his rookie season which isn't surprising considering the team featured Nelson, Jennings, Finley, Jones and Driver as pass catchers.
In addition his 2013 season was cut short because of a freak injury he suffered in Cincinnati but he had 111 receptions for 1,387 yards and 12 touchdowns in only 21 games during his second and third year in the league.
Thompson made the right decision to re-sign him.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that when healthy Randall Cobb is an average nfl receiver.
Yet you did anyway.I don't want to be playing devil's advocat here but the Packers could end up 2.5 games behind the Bears with six games left if they lose at Seattle.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that when healthy Randall Cobb is an average nfl receiver.
Regardless, I think we can all agree that he's most likely a goner this off season unless he takes a massive pay cut.Cobb is an average receiver at this point in his career but he was a young, elite one when Thompson re-signed him in 2014.
Regardless, I think we can all agree that he's most likely a goner this off season unless he takes a massive pay cut.
Probably. The injuries have been stacking up. Calendar age is one thing (29 next season), wear and tear is another.Even in that case it might be smart for the Packers to let Cobb walk away in free agency next offseason.
Yes he was. Besides the obvious stats, he caught 72% of his targets and made a first down on 78% of his catches. That second stat is insanely high. Here's the thing. He was the go-to guy on extended plays. For whatever reason he has not been that guy since.2014 Cobb was very, very good.
I'm good rolling forward with Adams, MVS, EQ, and Allison on a cheap deal. Maybe Moore will have made a big leap forward by next season as well.I can’t foresee Cobb being back at any price other than minimum type deals. Too injured too often. Still not sure what happened to him this time be he does no good I’m the training room and not in the field. He looked good to start the year, then had a poor game wit ball security and hasn’t seen it remotely healthy since.
I'm good rolling forward with Adams, MVS, EQ, and Allison on a cheap deal. Maybe Moore will have made a big leap forward by next season as well.
It's good that we have a couple young guys getting meaningful snaps right now. Might hurt us a bit this season, but it will set us up nicely for the next few years. MVS has the potential to explode.
Good point. I actually meant to add that as a foot note in my post.The Packers might still need to add a slot receiver in Cobb's mold next offseason though.
Only difference with Jordy and Cobb is that (besides 2015 of course) Jordy has stayed pretty healthy and remained a reliable target for Rodgers. Cobb might have a little more trouble finding work outside of the Packers given his nagging history with hamstring injuries.Cobb is very close to AR, just had a baby, and has been in Green Bay a long time.
I can see him taking a pretty dramatic pay cut in order to stay, and I really don't see other teams in the league breaking the bank for him. Just a hunch though. The same exact thing could be said for Jordy and we know how that turned out.