Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 876789" data-attributes="member: 10086">Yes. Absolutely.The “need” absolutely factors in. That’s what I meant by it was a “tertiary” need.  It’s just my guess that QB wasn’t our primary need, but the other players rated similar at our “primary” needs had magically disappeared. They obviously didn’t see those eventual early day 2 WR or day 2 LBs as a great value at a #30 selection and as you said, the positions they were compelled to concentrate just didn’t give them near that value of choosing Love.  They essentially redirected back to their research draft board if you will.They likely had another thought of punting and trading back a few spots to pick up collateral and hitting a different hot zone in round 2 (or maybe that was just my fantasy strategy!) I would’ve absolutely loved to see us trade back to #33 and gain another 4th rounder. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/whistling.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":whistling:" title="Whistling    :whistling:" data-shortname=":whistling:" />I am very curious though? I wish I could ask Gute directly but he probably wouldn’t divulge his methodology or thought process... who did we think was going to snatch Love before our original #30?I’d buy someone Chick a Filet and promise not to tell just to know that last minute discussion.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 69 (members: 1, guests: 68)

S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
- Latest: Schultz
- Today at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
- Latest: Schultz
- Today at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
- Latest: El Guapo
- Today at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: Thirteen Below
- Today at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
- Latest: tynimiller
- Today at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk