Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1002478" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Oh yeah I didn’t imply it was you Mondio in particular that discounted Love based on a 1 singular College season. That said i guess when I see that INT thing by itself I guess have seen this INT factor get massaged to the bone with Love, ad nauseam. This I’m sensitive to it because it’s become a theme in here. Thus I’m only notating that Loves overall picture has to include his college days until he has a larger sample. His college days showed “normal” range is my only point. I’m not pointing at anyone, just clarifying his career Ratio because it’s somewhat oversold as terrible. There’s no real basis for it at this point until we see a good sample of NFL action. It’s certainly not wholly accurate from before the Pro level, unless we’re basing it on 1 start.</p><p></p><p> I agree though put any 1st year starter in and with a newer grouping of weapons it’s a concern. That said Rodgers had established veterans around him in 2008 as a 1st year starter. Even he was 2:1 ratio (below his elite standards) and he’s the Yoda Master of TD:INT ratio. It shouldn’t be unexpected to see Loves 1st season in that 3:2 ratio (30/20;27/18;24/16;21/14) with an island of misfit toys <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/eek.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" data-shortname=":eek:" /> etc. j/k</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1002478, member: 10086"] Oh yeah I didn’t imply it was you Mondio in particular that discounted Love based on a 1 singular College season. That said i guess when I see that INT thing by itself I guess have seen this INT factor get massaged to the bone with Love, ad nauseam. This I’m sensitive to it because it’s become a theme in here. Thus I’m only notating that Loves overall picture has to include his college days until he has a larger sample. His college days showed “normal” range is my only point. I’m not pointing at anyone, just clarifying his career Ratio because it’s somewhat oversold as terrible. There’s no real basis for it at this point until we see a good sample of NFL action. It’s certainly not wholly accurate from before the Pro level, unless we’re basing it on 1 start. I agree though put any 1st year starter in and with a newer grouping of weapons it’s a concern. That said Rodgers had established veterans around him in 2008 as a 1st year starter. Even he was 2:1 ratio (below his elite standards) and he’s the Yoda Master of TD:INT ratio. It shouldn’t be unexpected to see Loves 1st season in that 3:2 ratio (30/20;27/18;24/16;21/14) with an island of misfit toys :eek: etc. j/k [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Pkrjones
Snoops
Half Empty
DABIGZ
Latest posts
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: PikeBadger
31 minutes ago
Draft Talk
P
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: pacmaniac
45 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: mradtke66
52 minutes ago
Draft Talk
S
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: Schultz
Today at 10:08 AM
Draft Talk
Nearly Perfect Draft...
Latest: milani
Today at 9:58 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top