gbgary
Cheesehead
yes. there's no misunderstanding.It's not on pushing AR up, but to compare him with other veterans out there.
yes. there's no misunderstanding.It's not on pushing AR up, but to compare him with other veterans out there.
*facepalm*Not when you have an agenda to push...
Gary come on, you had to have seen that coming. Again you're not the worst here, but surely you know that a decent amount see your opinions on the negative side in regards to Rodgers.*facepalm*
Amen. We’re long overdue, so we either double down or use pick #30 in some capacity to lock down that WR.Quarterback A having a better statistical season than quarterback B doesn't automatically make QBA better than QBB. For instance, Ryan Tannehill is not a better quarterback than Aaron Rodgers despite whatever argument that one tries to make about the numbers.
Rodgers didn't have a particularly great season in year 1 of a new system with the worst supporting cast of pass catchers he's ever had.
Get Rodgers a legit tight end and another WR threat, and a lot of this Rodgers talk becomes moot.
I hear he's been doing one heck of a Smilin' Bob impersonation these days. More room in the sleigh and packing a full sack if you know what I mean.Has anyone asked Danica about Rodgers's "performance" issues? Just wondering
Tmi...almost like you know from experience?I hear he's been doing one heck of a Smilin' Bob impersonation these days. More room in the sleigh and packing a full sack if you know what I mean.
i posted his actual numbers, a complementary article, and agreed with several sensable posts. what's negative about that?Gary come on, you had to have seen that coming. Again you're not the worst here, but surely you know that a decent amount see your opinions on the negative side in regards to Rodgers.
i posted his actual numbers, a complementary article, and agreed with several sensable posts. what's negative about that?
She said he “gyrates like hitting a 4th quarter turn just a little too fast with a comprised suspension”. but it’s largely unsubstantiated.Has anyone asked Danica about Rodgers's "performance" issues? Just wondering
So apparently she prefers a stiffer suspension than he can provide.She said he “gyrates like hitting a 4th quarter turn just a little too fast with a comprised suspension”. but it’s largely unsubstantiated.
Likely. But thus far, they’ve both overcome their deficiencies together... as they each excel in “clutch” situations.So apparently she prefers a stiffer suspension than he can provide.
Rodgers window should be closing the next 2 years. We are in win now mode, or trade now mode. We can't afford to pay that much money and ignore developing future QBs for a QB that is clearly missing targets and in decline.
The Packers can't trade Rodgers at this point as the move would currently result in an additional cap hit of $24 million.
I understand. We are tied to him for the next two years at least. In 2022 the dead cap would be $17 million with a cap cost of $39 million. That would be the first year it would be financially viable. In 2023 the dead cap would be $2.8 million with a cap cost of $28 million. The way I see it the Packers have a two year window with him as are unquestioned starter. He plays smart with the ball not turning it over, and we are winning games. He is worth the money right now. I would love to see him back to his old self with his arm which for a few years was the best in the league and at times some of his throws were among the best ever. Hopefully it was just a product of a new system and receivers out of place, and not a sign that his accuracy is in a quick decline.
OK, you're crazy. I doubt throwing zero interceptions in a season is any kind of Rodgers objective. We've seen throws into sideline coverage that are psudo-punts, including one this season, where a pick is as good as a punt, in a risk-reward calculation.Call me crazy but I think the best thing that could happen to Rodgers is for him to throw 3 INTs in Week 1 next season. He probably wants to become the first starting QB to ever throw zero INTs in a season. So throw 3 picks in game 1, and he can just sling it the rest of the season without caring about throwing zero picks or breaking the TD-to-INT ratio record.
Exactly.OK, you're crazy. I doubt throwing zero interceptions in a season is any kind of Rodgers objective. We've seen throws into sideline coverage that are psudo-punts, including one this season, where a pick is as good as a punt, in a risk-reward calculation.
"Just slinging it", with Winston being the most extreme example. isn't anything you want to see from your QB.
Has anyone asked Danica about Rodgers's "performance" issues? Just wondering
I understand. We are tied to him for the next two years at least. In 2022 the dead cap would be $17 million with a cap cost of $39 million. That would be the first year it would be financially viable. In 2023 the dead cap would be $2.8 million with a cap cost of $28 million. The way I see it the Packers have a two year window with him as are unquestioned starter. He plays smart with the ball not turning it over, and we are winning games. He is worth the money right now. I would love to see him back to his old self with his arm which for a few years was the best in the league and at times some of his throws were among the best ever. Hopefully it was just a product of a new system and receivers out of place, and not a sign that his accuracy is in a quick decline.
If we can find another guy like Adams and Sternberger continues to improve AR should be better in 2020.
Could we please stop acting as if Sternberger has shown anything justifying all the praise for him on this forum.