OldSchool101
Pack
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 16,892
- Reaction score
- 7,674
Today was held a clinic. This is the first time I’ve seen Rodgers open a full assault with all his weapons. It reminded me of Brett Favre. He used every player... twice.
Chart only has 4 white dots for incompletes. The grounding from the endzone that wasn't called (in Gruden's non-challenge opinion) isn't there.You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Funny. I was going to say the same thing, but I was going to say Raven Green in coverage in the middle and D Savage at Safety erases 50% of our dilemma IMO.MAYBE IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO TRADE AR12 EVEN-UP TO THE BEARS FOR MITCH TRU*****SKI?!?!?!?!?
Yesterday's game, imperfect though it may have been, was a thing of beauty. I just sat back in my chair, slurped my beer, and watched AR12 shred the Raiders D.
I think we get D. Savage back and we'll be A-OK.
LSWR
Even up? They need to at least throw Ha Ha in there to make that happenMAYBE IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO TRADE AR12 EVEN-UP TO THE BEARS FOR MITCH TRU*****SKI?!?!?!?!?
Didn't they make playoffs just last season with same team?The Bears are Exhibit A on why you still need a serviceable QB to win even with a good defense. Of course that defense doesn't appear to be the juggernaut everyone thought it was going to be...
Didn't they make playoffs just last season with same team?
My one concern about getting Adams back is the Aaron will go back to focusing on him and not continue to spread the ball around. I know that Adams is a pro-bowler but it seems to me that if Aaron continues to spread the ball then defenses won't know who to cover, right?
legit concern. adams is too big a talent not to regain some of that focus though. it's up to MLF, and rodgers, to not let it get out of hand. i can't imagine there haven't been some lessons learned during adams' absence.My one concern about getting Adams back is the Aaron will go back to focusing on him and not continue to spread the ball around. I know that Adams is a pro-bowler but it seems to me that if Aaron continues to spread the ball then defenses won't know who to cover, right?
Funny. I was going to say the same thing, but I was going to say Raven Green in coverage in the middle and D Savage at Safety erases 50% of our dilemma IMO.
The Bears are Exhibit A on why you still need a serviceable QB to win even with a good defense. Of course that defense doesn't appear to be the juggernaut everyone thought it was going to be...
My one concern about getting Adams back is the Aaron will go back to focusing on him and not continue to spread the ball around. I know that Adams is a pro-bowler but it seems to me that if Aaron continues to spread the ball then defenses won't know who to cover, right?
If Rodgers wins the MVP, great, I'll be happy. But I'd much rather have a Super Bowl.Very quietly, Rodgers has at least entered the discussion for MVP.
It always baffles me when there's a conversation about regular season MVP and others always swoop in and discredit the conversation by saying "well I'd much rather have a Super Bowl". We would all prefer to have a Super Bowl. Doesn't mean a conversation cannot be had about something else. The two do not have to be mutually exclusive.If Rodgers wins the MVP, great, I'll be happy. But I'd much rather have a Super Bowl.
Side note: I remember when Desmond Howard won the Super Bowl XXXI MVP, and a lot of troll types used it as some sort of condemnation of Favre, as if that proved Favre wasn't that good or whatever. I always thought they could have just as easily given that award to Favre, but whatever. I don't care about the individual stuff so much, it's a team game.
Well at the end of the season, they don't look at "would be" interceptions or "lucky plays". They look at stats, production, value to team, and record. Of which he's looking good in all.I don't think he's in the MVP conversation yet. Had one spectacular game last week but was just above par for Chiefs game imo.
- Was quite lucky in DBs not able to hold on for interception...twice.
- Admitted in post interview that the amazing TD throw to Williams was lucky break as he threw hoping for Graham to make a leap (the throw was way to high for any kind of leap).
- Two avoidable sacks, esp the big one in 1Q. Really unnecessary.
The offence is fluid, but he really needs more support from the Slot WR and TEs. Jones and Williams are making up for it greatly, but the absence is still felt.
Once Davante is back, then we'll see the true MVP.
It always baffles me when there's a conversation about regular season MVP and others always swoop in and discredit the conversation by saying "well I'd much rather have a Super Bowl". We would all prefer to have a Super Bowl. Doesn't mean a conversation cannot be had about something else. The two do not have to be mutually exclusive.
I don't think he's in the MVP conversation yet. Had one spectacular game last week but was just above par for Chiefs game imo.
- Was quite lucky in DBs not able to hold on for interception...twice.
- Admitted in post interview that the amazing TD throw to Williams was lucky break as he threw hoping for Graham to make a leap (the throw was way to high for any kind of leap).
- Two avoidable sacks, esp the big one in 1Q. Really unnecessary.
The offence is fluid, but he really needs more support from the Slot WR and TEs. Jones and Williams are making up for it greatly, but the absence is still felt.
Once Davante is back, then we'll see the true MVP.
Well at the end of the season, they don't look at "would be" interceptions or "lucky plays". They look at stats, production, value to team, and record. Of which he's looking good in all.
There's only three quarterbacks in the NFL that are top 10 in yards per attempt, yards per game, passer rating, QBR, and touchdown passes. Mahomes, Wilson, Rodgers. He's in the conversation.
I agree that Rodgers wasn't perfect against the Chiefs by any means but other quarterbacks make mistakes and get lucky from time to time as well. If the Packers continue to win he will be in the discussion for the MVP award.
Agree with what you both are saying. I understand the MVP lists are usually skewed towards QBs, but still....for me even I'm still tempted to list Aaron Jones as the most valuable player till date for GB.
The only non-quarterbacks in the last 25 years that have won the MVP award:Agree with what you both are saying. I understand the MVP lists are usually skewed towards QBs, but still....for me even I'm still tempted to list Aaron Jones as the most valuable player till date for GB.
My one concern about getting Adams back is the Aaron will go back to focusing on him and not continue to spread the ball around. I know that Adams is a pro-bowler but it seems to me that if Aaron continues to spread the ball then defenses won't know who to cover, right?
I don't think he's in the MVP conversation yet. Had one spectacular game last week but was just above par for Chiefs game imo.
- Was quite lucky in DBs not able to hold on for interception...twice.
- Admitted in post interview that the amazing TD throw to Williams was lucky break as he threw hoping for Graham to make a leap (the throw was way to high for any kind of leap).
- Two avoidable sacks, esp the big one in 1Q. Really unnecessary.
The offence is fluid, but he really needs more support from the Slot WR and TEs. Jones and Williams are making up for it greatly, but the absence is still felt.
Once Davante is back, then we'll see the true MVP.