But you're right, I have typically reserved criticism of Rodgers and given him the benefit of the doubt. But if the guy is going to be as self-centered and above the team as he proved himself to be this off-season, he can get the microscope treatment. He hands out enough criticism to everyone else; I think he can afford to take some on himself.
Not going to turn this into a counter productive back and forth, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find him not being critical of himself in his remarks about both of the first two games. Took ownership after the Saints game, said he played an awful game, but he also wasn't going to sugarcoat the lackluster effort from others either. Part of leadership is holding guys accountable.
After last night's game, he continually beat himself up over the missed opportunities to MVS.
I think right now with the way the offseason went with him holding out until training camp, many are going to try talking negatives into existence instead of objectively taking things at face value.
There's a fundamental disagreement between my view, and your view on this issue. I think Rodgers' approach, right wrong or indifferent, has little to no effect on the team's view of him and how they will respond moving forward.
You'll never separate the offseason from the actual season. And that's fine. You're entitled to your view. But I feel strongly that the two will prove to have little to no correlation with each other as the season progresses.
Lastly, and I'm not necessarily projecting this onto you, but I just feel that some are going to be extremely bitter and disappointed that the perceived prognostication of Rodgers' actions wrecking the team could and likely will prove to not be the case at all.