D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
There are no stats for 2 point conversions from the 15 and other plays from the 15 are not a comparable situation. How many times have you seen offenses bog down inside the 5 yard line due to the compressed field they have to play on? It happens all the time.
Trying a two-point conversion from the 15 is exactly the same situation as facing third or fourth-and-goal from there. As I've pointed out earlier the success rate on those plays is at 10%. After being presented with these numbers common sense strongly suggests that it's a terrible idea.
The problem is that we pass for 2 point attempts almost every time and we have had almost no success at it from the 2. The field is simply too compressed for receivers to get any separation and Rodgers can only see a smaller portion of the field at any given moment. The advantages of going from the 15 are that there is room for our highly talented receivers to get separation and Rodgers can scan the field much more efficiently. If I had my way we would run Lacy or fake and bootleg every time. But we have a long history of lining up 4 and 5 receivers for these plays and it simply doesn't work from that range. If we insist on using these formations for 2 point conversion, there's no doubt they would be more successful from a little further away.
There's no doubt that play calling has been terrible going for two. I want McCarthy and Clements to at least mix it up more often but that doesn't mean they should try it from the 15.