Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n Duds vs The Vikings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1054027" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I agree on the fact that it seems like most centers/long snappers reposition the ball by pulling it closer to them. That said, I can't find a clear interpretation of the rules and if this changes the "neutral zone". The Neutral Zone is defined this way:</p><p></p><p><strong><em>"A virtual area that runs from sideline to sideline bounded by the forward and backward points of the football after it has been made ready for play. The offense and defense line up on opposite sides of the neutral zone and cannot enter it until the ball is snapped for the next play."</em></strong></p><p></p><p>The logical part of my brain says that the snapper, after moving the ball, has now created a new neutral zone, since that is the only thing that defenders can look at (placement of ball) to line up. However, if the refs and the NFL define the neutral zone as the imaginary area of the length of the football, from where they originally marked the ball (ready for play) and not where the snapper moved it to, then there is not doubt that most of the Packer defense was lined up offsides on that play.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If anyone finds a clear definition, please post it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 1054027, member: 7261"] I agree on the fact that it seems like most centers/long snappers reposition the ball by pulling it closer to them. That said, I can't find a clear interpretation of the rules and if this changes the "neutral zone". The Neutral Zone is defined this way: [B][I]"A virtual area that runs from sideline to sideline bounded by the forward and backward points of the football after it has been made ready for play. The offense and defense line up on opposite sides of the neutral zone and cannot enter it until the ball is snapped for the next play."[/I][/B] The logical part of my brain says that the snapper, after moving the ball, has now created a new neutral zone, since that is the only thing that defenders can look at (placement of ball) to line up. However, if the refs and the NFL define the neutral zone as the imaginary area of the length of the football, from where they originally marked the ball (ready for play) and not where the snapper moved it to, then there is not doubt that most of the Packer defense was lined up offsides on that play. If anyone finds a clear definition, please post it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n Duds vs The Vikings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top