Wait...what?? You are aware you are incredibly wrong? Did you watch the game?
Yep, you're right. But look at the drives... I think his short passes just threw me off as well as the desperation passes at the end of the game.
1st drive: 2 runs, 1 pass. PUNT
2nd: 5 runs, 6 passes (all short near the LOS except for Cobb and Watson passes).
Touchdown.
3rd: 2 runs up the middle for negligible gain, one attentional grounding pass. PUNT
4th: 3 short passes to Jones, nothing deep when down 8 and 32 seconds to go.
HALF.
5th: 7 short passes, one long pass to Lazard. One end around to Watson for 3 yards. 5 rushes.
Field goal.
6th: Two deep passes (Lazard and Cobb). One short pass. 2 rushes for minimal yardage.
Touchdown. Two-point conversion succeeds after pass to Jones.
7th: Two deep passes, incomplete. One rush for minimal yardage, PUNT.
8th: Two deep passes, incomplete one short pass to Cobb. One rush. PUNT.
9th: Two short passes, one deep. One rush. Turnover on downs.
10th: 7 short passes, one deep, one rush on 4th and 1. Turnover on downs.
By my count (and I'm probably off a bit because I'm angry)
25 short passes,
11 deep.
5.8 yards on average. 19 rushes (avg
2.9 y/c). Stats and depth of target from ESPN.
I'd assume the short passes are at or near the line of scrimmage or within about 5-7 yards. So our GENIUS offensive guru coach and HOF QB decide to throw into the teeth of this defense instead of attacking a poor secondary with deeper throws. Maybe we have a different ballgame if they threw deep (>10 yards) half a dozen or so more times. Make it make sense. Tannehill scorched our vaunted secondary with 333 yards throwing and 12.3 avg.
I expected to see the Packers take advantage of this matchup by throwing deeper and exposing their weaknesses. But nope. This team doesn't take advantage of matchup opportunities and lost as a result.
Mopey Rodgers doesn't help, what was he doing sitting on the sideline not keeping his thumb moving? Just sitting there all depressed, like fire up the team for goodness sakes.