Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers

sschind

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
5,321
Reaction score
1,546

U.P. Packfan

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
27
Reaction score
14
I think he'd retire too. If he went anywhere else it would be via trade. It's unlikely he'd get traded to a strong SB favorite, although he could change that dynamic. So IF he isn't in GB next year, he'll be in CA living the high life. And I think it might be a relief to fans to have this drama over. Rodgers took it way too far. Revenge never looks good on someone, zero-sum game. eye for an eye, and on. He's a great, great QB, but I doubt he's as happy as all his money would have us think. It's exhausting, and in the end depressing, to always have to be the smartest guy in the room - because someone smarter always comes along.

Didn't the agreement he reached with the Packers before the season say that he could/would be able to be sent where he wants for next year? At least that is what I remember them talking about on the news in the run up to training camp.
 
OP
OP
PackAttack12

PackAttack12

R-E-L-A-X
Joined
Sep 16, 2016
Messages
6,500
Reaction score
2,157
And I think it might be a relief to fans to have this drama over. Rodgers took it way too far. Revenge never looks good on someone, zero-sum game. eye for an eye, and on. He's a great, great QB, but I doubt he's as happy as all his money would have us think. It's exhausting, and in the end depressing, to always have to be the smartest guy in the room - because someone smarter always comes along.
I'd imagine you'll have a very different perspective if Rodgers isn't with the Packers this exact time next year and the team is 4-9. Some can bloviate all they want to about Rodgers and his arrogance and oh my goodness he hurt my feelings. At the end of the day, he's handling his business on the field and hasn't been a distraction a single time this season outside of the COVID crap.

10-3 and in position to nab the #1 seed yet it'll be a relief when he's gone....lol.

The guy won MVP last year and has the 2nd best odds in Vegas to win it again this year. I can promise you I won't be relieved when he's gone and being forced to watch Love spray it all over the field. Likely to the opposing team.
 

sschind

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
5,321
Reaction score
1,546
Didn't the agreement he reached with the Packers before the season say that he could/would be able to be sent where he wants for next year? At least that is what I remember them talking about on the news in the run up to training camp.
I don't think he can choose his destination. The media may have said that but if I recall Rodgers himself said that was not the case.
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
For what it's worth, Dianna Russini reported that Rodgers is most likely going to leave the organization next year, even if the team wins the Super Bowl.


As long as Rodgers publicly declares he won't play for the Packers anymore or the team announces that they have traded him to another club I don't care about what some reporters I have never heard of have to say about the situation. Neither should anyone else.

And I think it might be a relief to fans to have this drama over. Rodgers took it way too far.

There's no reason to look forward to the day the Packers will have moved on from Rodgers as the team will be without a HOF quarterback moving forward at that point.
 

Krabs

I take offense to that sir.
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
1,021
Didn't the agreement he reached with the Packers before the season say that he could/would be able to be sent where he wants for next year?
No, they knocked a year off of his contract for him. He remains under contract next season. They verbally committed to sitting down at the end of the season to review the situation and talk about a trade if he wants one. There is nothing in the contract that says Rodgers gets to request a trade and choose his team. Basically, the Packers agreed to communicate with him more and be in the conversation about decision making. The obvious example is brining Cobb back in, which Gutey said himself would not have happened if not for Rodgers requesting it.
 

Heyjoe4

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
7,433
Reaction score
2,260
As long as Rodgers publicly declares he won't play for the Packers anymore or the team announces that they have traded him to another club I don't care about what some reporters I have never heard of have to say about the situation. Neither should anyone else.



There's no reason to look forward to the day the Packers will have moved on from Rodgers as the team will be without a HOF quarterback moving forward at that point.
Don't get me wrong, I'll certainly miss what he brings to the Packers, which are wins. I'm just tired of the games he seems to love to play with the media. Probably best to ignore all of that and enjoy the way he plays the game for as long as he's here. That has been a pleasure, especially on our team.

And who the hell is Dianna Russini anyway? Ignore that.
 

Magooch

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Messages
968
Reaction score
917
I'm sure it's been said before (but I'm new here, so...) but more and more I get the sense that Rodgers isn't nearly as dead-set on leaving as it's seemed like the media has often made him out to be. I've no doubt he certainly has his gripes still but at the same time it certainly doesn't feel to me like he's absolutely determined to leave no matter what. And maybe I'm being a homer, but I'm not convinced there are many (if any teams) that we'd realistically trade him to who give him a better shot at winning another (hopefully a third, you know) Super Bowl next season.

I don't think Jordan Love is as bad as some have made him out to be and I don't think that Chiefs game was terribly representative of what we'd get with him as full-time starter (hopefully!) but at the same time I'm not sure he's what we should be wanting to hitch our wagons to and I'm pretty confident things would get appreciably worse before they'd get better. I'd feel bad for the kid but I think it's pretty clear that at the moment the best-case scenario for the team is one in which Rodgers continues as our starting quarterback for the next few seasons rather than Love.
 

Krabs

I take offense to that sir.
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
1,021
I'm sure it's been said before (but I'm new here, so...) but more and more I get the sense that Rodgers isn't nearly as dead-set on leaving as it's seemed like the media has often made him out to be. I've no doubt he certainly has his gripes still but at the same time it certainly doesn't feel to me like he's absolutely determined to leave no matter what. And maybe I'm being a homer, but I'm not convinced there are many (if any teams) that we'd realistically trade him to who give him a better shot at winning another (hopefully a third, you know) Super Bowl next season.

I don't think Jordan Love is as bad as some have made him out to be and I don't think that Chiefs game was terribly representative of what we'd get with him as full-time starter (hopefully!) but at the same time I'm not sure he's what we should be wanting to hitch our wagons to and I'm pretty confident things would get appreciably worse before they'd get better. I'd feel bad for the kid but I think it's pretty clear that at the moment the best-case scenario for the team is one in which Rodgers continues as our starting quarterback for the next few seasons rather than Love.
I agree that it seems less likely that Rodgers will leave. However, the season is in the playoff push mode right now and the focus really is on that. Once the offseason starts the focus may change back to Rodgers and what he is disgruntled about.

As far as Love goes, I want to be a believer, but I'm just not. I don't think he has it. Hope he proves me wrong.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,621
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
I get the sense that Rodgers isn't nearly as dead-set on leaving as it's seemed like the media has often made him out to be.
Pretty much right on. I think the media and us fans for that matter, like to make more out of a story than there probably is. After all it is Aaron fricking Rodgers and pretty much anything he does is considered news worthy by most. This last offseason was as bad as you wanted to make it for Packer fans and I admittedly bought into a lot of the talk too. Like some here have mentioned, I am just going to continue to enjoy the ride with Rodgers at the wheel. His ability to play this game at a high level and make the Packers winners is something I may never see again in my lifetime. Obviously, at some point it will have to end and the Packers short and long term success has to be factored into what happens next with Rodgers. I think whoever takes over for Rodgers is going to have a bumpy ride and when that day comes, most Packer fans will fully realize just how good life was with #12 behind center.
 

Magooch

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Messages
968
Reaction score
917
I agree that it seems less likely that Rodgers will leave. However, the season is in the playoff push mode right now and the focus really is on that. Once the offseason starts the focus may change back to Rodgers and what he is disgruntled about.

As far as Love goes, I want to be a believer, but I'm just not. I don't think he has it. Hope he proves me wrong.
That's probably fair. I'm curious how the offseason's potential personnel moves might impact things too - could be tough to balance between what Rodgers wants to see happen and what's best for the team. No secret he loves paying with Davante, but I'd think it'd be quite costly to bring them both back (though, at the same time I get the feeling if one leaves the other will go, too). Of course, I'm sure others know the financial implications better than I, but still - have to think that's going to mean losing some other players elsewhere. He's long been friends with Crosby, but I'd argue the best move for the team is to look to replace him. Would Rodgers be okay with that? Hard for me (or any of us, tbh) to say!

But, we'll see. I really could see it going either way at this point. Maybe we win the Super Bowl and he decides he wants to stay and try and run it back. Or maybe we win and he decides that's a fitting end to this chapter. Maybe we come up short in the playoffs and that's the last straw. Maybe we come up short and enough changes have been made that it motivates him to continue trying to win it in GB. (That last one seems least likely, but you never know).
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,621
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
If Rodgers wants to stick around in 2022, he is probably going to have to do so under a reworked contract, especially if he/Packers want to keep Davante around, as well as a few other key players. The cap issues may force everyone's hands to do things that they really don't want to and if Rodgers leaves via a trade, I can see Gute deciding that it is time to purge other high end players and start that rebuild process with lots of draft capital and a relatively clean cap.
 

Heyjoe4

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
7,433
Reaction score
2,260
That's probably fair. I'm curious how the offseason's potential personnel moves might impact things too - could be tough to balance between what Rodgers wants to see happen and what's best for the team. No secret he loves paying with Davante, but I'd think it'd be quite costly to bring them both back (though, at the same time I get the feeling if one leaves the other will go, too). Of course, I'm sure others know the financial implications better than I, but still - have to think that's going to mean losing some other players elsewhere. He's long been friends with Crosby, but I'd argue the best move for the team is to look to replace him. Would Rodgers be okay with that? Hard for me (or any of us, tbh) to say!

But, we'll see. I really could see it going either way at this point. Maybe we win the Super Bowl and he decides he wants to stay and try and run it back. Or maybe we win and he decides that's a fitting end to this chapter. Maybe we come up short in the playoffs and that's the last straw. Maybe we come up short and enough changes have been made that it motivates him to continue trying to win it in GB. (That last one seems least likely, but you never know).
With all the different scenarios involving Rodgers, I've decided it's best to just focus on the football, the great season he and the team are having, and hopefully it leads to a Lombardi Trophy. As always, the rest of the stuff will sort itself out. Ya know, it's easier to accept what you can't change anyway. I hope he's back. He certainly looks like he has a lot of football left. But I'll let that play out and keep cheering for the Packers.
 
Joined
May 19, 2021
Messages
9
Reaction score
3
All things have an ending. We all know he is a great QB, however he does not nor should he control personnel. He should have been traded earlier this year for a ton of excellent players and/or draft picks.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
5,710
Reaction score
1,438
I really like the Rodgers of today. I have watched him on that funky program with A.J. Hawk and he comes across as likeable and able to take a joke. He is not sulky like he used to be. And the team is playing like a team. He is partly why that is. For me it just comes down to can we afford him? And what is best for the now and for the future. All this talk about him and Devonte...I don't see them as actually linked. Obviously we are better with Devante but... And Rodgers actually does have an understanding of Packer history imho. And I like that.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,621
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
I really like the Rodgers of today. I have watched him on that funky program with A.J. Hawk and he comes across as likeable and able to take a joke. He is not sulky like he used to be. And the team is playing like a team. He is partly why that is. For me it just comes down to can we afford him? And what is best for the now and for the future. All this talk about him and Devonte...I don't see them as actually linked. Obviously we are better with Devante but... And Rodgers actually does have an understanding of Packer history imho. And I like that.
Agreed and if given a choice of only being able to keep 1 player, I'd take Rodgers over Davante, no questions asked.
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
All things have an ending. We all know he is a great QB, however he does not nor should he control personnel. He should have been traded earlier this year for a ton of excellent players and/or draft picks.

The Packers currently having the best record in the league strongly suggests it would have been a terrible idea to trade Rodgers this past offseason.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,621
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
The Packers currently having the best record in the league strongly suggests it would have been a terrible idea to trade Rodgers this past offseason.
I agree with you, it has been a very successful season with Rodgers still in Green and Gold. However, I do wonder how many Packer fans will change their tune if the Packers don't win a Super Bowl and the "Rodgers noise" starts up again.
 

Krabs

I take offense to that sir.
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
1,021
I agree with you, it has been a very successful season with Rodgers still in Green and Gold. However, I do wonder how many Packer fans will change their tune if the Packers don't win a Super Bowl and the "Rodgers noise" starts up again.
This is already a known. During the offseason the fans will start complaining when Rodgers is disgruntled and call for his head. Then the season will start and all that chatter will float away into the nothingness of football rumors.
 

Schultz

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,903
Reaction score
1,665
The only way trading Rodgers would have been the better move is an early play off exit and then he retires and they get nothing in return for him.
 
Joined
May 19, 2021
Messages
9
Reaction score
3
The Packers currently having the best record in the league strongly suggests it would have been a terrible idea to trade Rodgers this past offseason.
Of course we are having a great season. That's not the issue.
Don't get me wrong, I have been a Packer fan since 1960. I just have a hard time understanding how players can dictate conduct during the national anthem, or control personnel. Rogers had an issue with our GM, and wanted him fired. That's just wrong.
It's like having T. Owens on our team, which is analagous to how Rodgers is acting. No one person is irreplaceable as good as they are.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,621
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
Of course we are having a great season. That's not the issue.
Don't get me wrong, I have been a Packer fan since 1960. I just have a hard time understanding how players can dictate conduct during the national anthem, or control personnel. Rogers had an issue with our GM, and wanted him fired. That's just wrong.
It's like having T. Owens on our team, which is analagous to how Rodgers is acting. No one person is irreplaceable as good as they are.
Welcome to the 21st Century, where players are allowed to speak out and have opinions. ;) It seems to have spread to the rest of the population as well. What you want to do with that knowledge is up to you I guess.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,621
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
then he retires and they get nothing in return for him.
That is my one concern. It became obvious that Rodgers wanted to play last season. One more year, bad toe, soon to be wife, maybe kids, a possible Super Bowl trophy, MVP, etc. might make retirement look much better than finishing his career in New York playing for the Jets or Giants. While I would love to see Rodgers play 5+ more years in a Packer jersey, if the Packers can get some decent value for him before he either becomes a free agent of retires, I would be fine with that.

Ideal scenario, rework his contract to keep him in GB for another 5 years and do it in a way that frees up some cap space for 2022.
 

Members online

Top