your the mod to make him “get out of here”????Get out of here. You enjoyed the hail marys, the Super Bowl, and more. Shameful words from you. Give back that joy you had.
i should be informed and consulted.. i been here (ironically) 17 years
your the mod to make him “get out of here”????Get out of here. You enjoyed the hail marys, the Super Bowl, and more. Shameful words from you. Give back that joy you had.
3 and a couple. But, Aaron has always been Aaron. It was evident this was his personality on draft night 17 years ago.Just curious
how many SB and hail marys B4 Rodgers?
I'm not making him do anything. But he enjoyed the Rodgers years 100%.your the mod to make him “get out of here”????
i should be informed and consulted.. i been here (ironically) 17 years
C'mon LTF. You know better than this. He might not 'techinically' be the one making 'authoritative' decisions, but if you pay attention you'll see what's going on. He was very vocal about his desire to get Antonio Brown, Gronk, Fournette, etc.Tom Brady clarifies role in Patriots' decision-making prior to NFL trade deadline
If you read between the lines of Tom Brady’s comments after Ben Watson’s release last week, you could sense the New England Patriots quarterback perhaps wasn’t thrilled with his current group of skill players. But the NFL trade deadline is approaching later this month. So, will Brady go to head...www.nbcsports.com
... I am a player like everyone else. I am not in a position where I make authoritative decisions,
The quote.. Rodgers said the oppositeC'mon LTF. You know better than this. He might not 'techinically' be the one making 'authoritative' decisions, but if you pay attention you'll see what's going on. He was very vocal about his desire to get Antonio Brown, Gronk, Fournette, etc.
Bruce Ariens literally said "we're not in the Antonio Brown business". Guess what ended up happening as a result? They signed him because Brady wanted him. Brady orchestrated convincing Gronk to come out of retirement and getting the Bucs to trade for him.
Just watch. Edelman will be there before it's all over with.
To think Brady has nothing to do with what's going on with personnel is just naïve.
No, but my employer hasn`t paid me millions of dollars and constantly kissed my *** telling me how good I was. If they did, AND saved me from further embarrasment when I thought I was best thing since sliced bread in the draft, I might show some humility.Dude its just his job...do you bleed for your employer?
Are you looking to retire ? or get traded to another forum ?your the mod to make him “get out of here”????
i should be informed and consulted.. i been here (ironically) 17 years
Well, it would be if they needed to pay other players. If he can do it all himself, that's great. However, the track record doesn't seem to support it.Having a unanimous 1st ballot hall of famer on the roster is such a hinderance.
That's been the problem for over a decade. We know we can have a playoff spot locked up, probably well before the end of the regular season. THEN comes the heartbreak.*****. Check back with me in week 15 when we've already got a playoff spot locked up, sport.
I don't think the Cobb thing, which is the direct correlation to Brady's input, rubbed folks the wrong way as much as the "this is what I want for ME" stuff. There may have been some of that with Brady, but I don't remember it.Yeah. Just take the Tampa Bay Buccaneers letting Tom Brady have personnel input as an example of how awful of an idea it is.
Oh wait...
OK, now some of the posts make sense. If one can one hundred percent enjoy having your team dismissed from the playoffs in a variety of hurtful ways, one can enjoy any of the players 100%, also.I'm not making him do anything. But he enjoyed the Rodgers years 100%.
And that's pretty funny timing. Are you going to be back after this year? Or going to take your plane down to Hattiesburg?
No, but my employer hasn`t paid me millions of dollars and constantly kissed my *** telling me how good I was. If they did, AND saved me from further embarrasment when I thought I was best thing since sliced bread in the draft, I might show some humility.
From a practical standpoint, why would anyone want management to "listen to his input" unless he thinks that input will affect the decision?I must have missed the part where he said he wanted a say in personnel decisions. What I heard was that he wanted them to listen to his input. I think everyone saying he wants to be the GM is reading too much into it.
I guess I don't see anything wrong with him adding his input to decisions that affect him. If you have two players at the bottom of the WR depth chart who
are pretty much equal and Aaron knows everyone loves one of them but the other is a ********* that everyone hates why not listen to him and take that into consideration. That's what I am hearing.
If cobb isnt here either is rodgers.I must have missed the part where he said he wanted a say in personnel decisions. What I heard was that he wanted them to listen to his input. I think everyone saying he wants to be the GM is reading too much into it.
I guess I don't see anything wrong with him adding his input to decisions that affect him. If you have two players at the bottom of the WR depth chart who
are pretty much equal and Aaron knows everyone loves one of them but the other is a ********* that everyone hates why not listen to him and take that into consideration. That's what I am hearing.
You might be right mate, but in my simple way of looking at it is, MY WAY. He`s an employee of the Green Bay Packer organisation, he isn`t the Green Bay organisation. Sorry mate, I might be a simpleton, but that`s my honest opinion.You'd want everyone to always be humble but hardly anyone is...I don't think it should matter how much his employer pays him. I look at that as good for him, he's getting something a lot closer to the price of time than me
2005-2021=16 years, I knew all Y'all yanks couldn't speak proper english, but thought you could at least use maths(yes there's and s at the end)your the mod to make him “get out of here”????
i should be informed and consulted.. i been here (ironically) 17 years
So I’m confused. Is Rodgers still under contract for 2022? i.e. the Packers have something to trade? What happens capwise if we trade him next April? OK A-rod…. you got everything you want…. Put up or shut up time Mr. MVP (except in NFCCGs), or did Green Bay also have to give him play calling authority on 4th down. Can you see LaFluer calling for the FG and Rodgers pulls a contract page out of his jockstrap and tells Longwell…. “Not so fast kicker-boy…. Yeah I whiffed 3 straight downs (again) in the red zone…. But para 3 subsection 2 bowlegs (i) of my contract give me veto power in the final minutes of NFCCGs where I haven’t done jack squat the entire second half”….