Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 761331" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>Yes, Rodgers is absolutely more important to this team than MM. To suggest otherwise is just silly. We just got to see what this team was like without Rodgers and it was, to say the least, unimpressive. I might, <em>might</em>, be inclined to say that Belichick is as important as a great QB but Belichick is both the GM and one of the greatest coaches in NFL history. MM is neither of those things.</p><p></p><p>Also, at what point did I say that Rodgers needed to be the coach, staff, etc.? I simply said that keeping him in the loop and communicating would be a good idea. I really don't understand the idea that discussing things with the best player in the NFL is somehow a ridiculous thing to do. As I said, you're not giving Rodgers the ability to veto any decisions, you're just talking with him and keeping him up to date on things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 761331, member: 9033"] Yes, Rodgers is absolutely more important to this team than MM. To suggest otherwise is just silly. We just got to see what this team was like without Rodgers and it was, to say the least, unimpressive. I might, [I]might[/I], be inclined to say that Belichick is as important as a great QB but Belichick is both the GM and one of the greatest coaches in NFL history. MM is neither of those things. Also, at what point did I say that Rodgers needed to be the coach, staff, etc.? I simply said that keeping him in the loop and communicating would be a good idea. I really don't understand the idea that discussing things with the best player in the NFL is somehow a ridiculous thing to do. As I said, you're not giving Rodgers the ability to veto any decisions, you're just talking with him and keeping him up to date on things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top