Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rebuild a new LaFleur offense or get what Pettine needs on defense?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 820029" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>Why should anyone care about analysts and their opinions? We've all got them. I <strong><em>really</em></strong> don't care what a Fantasy Analyst thinks about anything. It's not real football. It's DnD that uses statistics instead of character sheets and dice. What is good for fantasy is not necessarily good for actually winning games.</p><p></p><p>Actually looking at the stats, yes, the Bucs had some great positive stats in passing.</p><p></p><p>6th in completions</p><p>1st in yards</p><p>2nd in yards/attempt</p><p>3rd (tied) in passing TDs</p><p></p><p>And they had some below average to bad stats as well</p><p></p><p>19th in completion percentage</p><p>1st in Thrown Interceptions</p><p></p><p></p><p>And some neutral ones as well</p><p></p><p>14th (tied) in sacks given up</p><p></p><p></p><p>And we have passer rating, which attempts to normalize all of the other stats into one. 15th. </p><p></p><p>Taken as a whole, I can't call that a top-5 passing offense, because it ignores the bad and only looks at the good. I'd have to stare at more stats, to come up with more informed opinion, but my gut is the passer rating is about right, possibly higher. Let's say somewhere between 10th and 15th.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 820029, member: 4199"] Why should anyone care about analysts and their opinions? We've all got them. I [B][I]really[/I][/B] don't care what a Fantasy Analyst thinks about anything. It's not real football. It's DnD that uses statistics instead of character sheets and dice. What is good for fantasy is not necessarily good for actually winning games. Actually looking at the stats, yes, the Bucs had some great positive stats in passing. 6th in completions 1st in yards 2nd in yards/attempt 3rd (tied) in passing TDs And they had some below average to bad stats as well 19th in completion percentage 1st in Thrown Interceptions And some neutral ones as well 14th (tied) in sacks given up And we have passer rating, which attempts to normalize all of the other stats into one. 15th. Taken as a whole, I can't call that a top-5 passing offense, because it ignores the bad and only looks at the good. I'd have to stare at more stats, to come up with more informed opinion, but my gut is the passer rating is about right, possibly higher. Let's say somewhere between 10th and 15th. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
DoURant
Latest posts
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: DoURant
8 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Should the Packers Start Revoking Season Tickets?
Latest: weeds
29 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 round 3 pick #78: Tucker Kraft TE
Latest: OldSchool101
31 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
How much time?
Latest: Heyjoe4
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
My Team Interest is the First Snap
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:23 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rebuild a new LaFleur offense or get what Pettine needs on defense?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top