Packerlifer
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,782
- Reaction score
- 118
Probably wanted to force the Bears to play a dime defense. Just because Ty lines up at RB doesn't mean the defense is going to play base. Put Rip in the game and the Bears can keep a LB on the field. Coaches probably felt that the Bears had better linebackers than corners and wanted to force the Bears to play bad cornerbacks. That's what's awesome about actually being versatile and letting Ty play RB. If the defense stays in base to stop the run, Montgomery can shift out wide and now you have a mismatch with a LB on Ty. If the defense goes to dime then you can run the ball with Montgomery.
Your analysis sounds sensible but they didn't get the td anyway. It just seems to me that in that situation with a big, powerful fullback and a line that could run block on that defense for a 4th and goal at the 1 at that point in the game the Pack probably would have gotten 7 more had Rip been the man on that play.
That game could have been 37-3 for the Packers with a td there, no ARod fumble and no missed PAT and blocked field goal. Now that would have been a game to crow about.