Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 1060657" data-attributes="member: 5830">Citing potential injuries as a justification in a sport that features violent high-speed collisions is a bit disingenuous by the Packers. If their goal was to lower injuries, they should ban hitting and tackling.It's an add-on to make their proposal carry more weight. Pace of play is a somewhat legitimate argument but only because of the playoff snafu. Otherwise the pace is very close to a QB sneak.The proposal is to ban the play because it seems generally unstoppable. My response would be not to let the Eagles get close to the 1st down marker.</blockquote>

Total: 78 (members: 3, guests: 75)