Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers are releasing Mike Daniels
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 837350" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I see your logic and in a 1 year tunnel that makes perfect sense. However we’re team building here and I’ve heard several GMs from around the league in interviews say that they realistically consider a 3 year outlook. They didn’t say so but they absolutely put more emphasis on year 1, then next year, then year 3 etc.. but year 2-3 absolutely, positively have some weight and correct me, but I didn’t see Mike Daniels here in 2020. If you think about it, as a GM you don’t want to narrow yourself to just this year, you also have to plan for the future couple of years (or you become like Chicago) <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/roflmao.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":roflmao:" title="ROFLMAO :roflmao:" data-shortname=":roflmao:" /></p><p>You have to consider monetary costs and then cross that with the next 3 years of expected production. Something I just thought about but rings true is the # of 3 year veteran contracts we hand out, I don’t think that’s coincidence. </p><p></p><p>So what I’m trying to say is it’s not that they didn’t want to keep Daniels or that he’s not worth $8M, its more that he’s a 1 year plan to them and his value after that probably drops significantly due to a Cap vs age/injury prognosis curve. These other guys are improving and they’re dirt cheap in comparison, plus they easily have a 3 year composite value.</p><p></p><p>We’re not even touching on schematic value yet. Obviously certain players fit together like puzzle pieces, they may see another player who possess the ability to mirror Daniels productivity (which we have to admit has been in decline recently) because they fit the process that Pettine is employing a little better. You certainly want the proper mix. I’ve noticed, One ingredient our current staff seems to value heavily is QB pressures and multi position ability, not necessarily just raw sack #’s.</p><p></p><p>We’ve got to trust our coaching staff a little more. I know we all think we’re semi experts but let’s face it you and me put together would not have 10% of the experience it takes. Nothing personal.</p><p></p><p>I believe Mike Pettine has what it takes, given the resources and some latitude with involvement on personnel changes I believe he’s a top 10 area DC. I don’t think for one second Pettine was not party to these changes. Until proven otherwise we have to trust in the process.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 837350, member: 10086"] I see your logic and in a 1 year tunnel that makes perfect sense. However we’re team building here and I’ve heard several GMs from around the league in interviews say that they realistically consider a 3 year outlook. They didn’t say so but they absolutely put more emphasis on year 1, then next year, then year 3 etc.. but year 2-3 absolutely, positively have some weight and correct me, but I didn’t see Mike Daniels here in 2020. If you think about it, as a GM you don’t want to narrow yourself to just this year, you also have to plan for the future couple of years (or you become like Chicago) :roflmao: You have to consider monetary costs and then cross that with the next 3 years of expected production. Something I just thought about but rings true is the # of 3 year veteran contracts we hand out, I don’t think that’s coincidence. So what I’m trying to say is it’s not that they didn’t want to keep Daniels or that he’s not worth $8M, its more that he’s a 1 year plan to them and his value after that probably drops significantly due to a Cap vs age/injury prognosis curve. These other guys are improving and they’re dirt cheap in comparison, plus they easily have a 3 year composite value. We’re not even touching on schematic value yet. Obviously certain players fit together like puzzle pieces, they may see another player who possess the ability to mirror Daniels productivity (which we have to admit has been in decline recently) because they fit the process that Pettine is employing a little better. You certainly want the proper mix. I’ve noticed, One ingredient our current staff seems to value heavily is QB pressures and multi position ability, not necessarily just raw sack #’s. We’ve got to trust our coaching staff a little more. I know we all think we’re semi experts but let’s face it you and me put together would not have 10% of the experience it takes. Nothing personal. I believe Mike Pettine has what it takes, given the resources and some latitude with involvement on personnel changes I believe he’s a top 10 area DC. I don’t think for one second Pettine was not party to these changes. Until proven otherwise we have to trust in the process. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers are releasing Mike Daniels
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
