Official Week 17 Green Bay vs Minnesota Pre-game

Firethorn1001

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
1,832
Reaction score
1,398
Do you think his knee is shot

Honestly, I have no idea. The last 2 years have been odd with his injury being veiled in secrecy and seemingly endless "Getting closer... getting closer.. Nope." Its just unusual IMHO. I understand the Packers are secretive about injuries, but this seems excessively secretive (that even possible to be excessively secretive? I don't know.. but I'm going with that)

At the end of the day it is a $25M player that has played 1/2 the games over a 2 year period so that is concerning. At this point it is a gamble on 2025.
 

Schultz

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,945
Reaction score
1,690
Nope. Don’t need to. Really just need to double Jefferson to mitigate him. Id put Stokes and Zayne on Jefferson.

As far as Weapons… past Jefferson because all you can do is mitigate a true #1.
Addison? Is he better than J. Reed? No
Hockenson? Is he better than Kraft? No
Aaron Jones better than Jacobs? No
Jalen Nailor better than Doubs? No

They win with their WR1. We Win as a Team. It seems to work we’re rated much higher across the board on O

Their backups?
Oliver, Sherfield, Ham, Powell, Cam Akers?
Are they better than Musgrave, Wicks, Wilson, Brooks? Nope.

But if everyone is going to worry. Who should be worried more? The Vikings #30 rated Pass Defense?
Or
GB’s #7 rated pass D?
that’s allowed 15.5 points per game since our Bye (#1 in the NFL)
At this point in their careers, I would rather have Addison and Hock over Reed and Kraft. For the long run I like Kraft, but still think Addison is better than Reed. Home field makes MN. tough. I am not saying this game is not winnable, just look at last year. I am just giving my opinion.
 

Schultz

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,945
Reaction score
1,690
I like the Packers chances especially with the Vikes O-line missing their starting LT. The Packers run the ball better behind a much superior offensive line and should be able to control the trenches on both sides of the ball. The Vikings haven’t swept the Packers since 2017 and are underdogs at home which shows Vegas doesn’t think much of their 13 wins.
I bet at 3 different sites and the Vikings are favorites at all of them. All be it, just 1 point favorites on 2 and 1.5 on the other.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,559
Reaction score
7,404
At this point in their careers, I would rather have Addison and Hock over Reed and Kraft. For the long run I like Kraft, but still think Addison is better than Reed. Home field makes MN. tough. I am not saying this game is not winnable, just look at last year. I am just giving my opinion.

See I disagree. I’d take Kraft and Reed over Hock and Addison.
It’s a good argument, but the past doesn’t matter. The past is the past.
Kraft is clearly playing better than TJ and I’ve say Reed and Addison are near twins. The Packer combo has the better production in a 2024 funnel.

If we’re talking who’s the best over the last 5 seasons. Ok it’s probably TJ :coffee:
 
Last edited:

pacmaniac

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
2,172
Reaction score
629
I think the Packers need to dominate and win by double-digits. If it's a close game it'll be tough. The Vikings are 25-10 in one-possession games under O'Connell.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,559
Reaction score
7,404
My only reservation is all the injuries that have piled up. I do think GB is well coached similar to Detroit and gets the best from whoever is up. Malik or Brenton Cox are couple examples.
It’s a prime example of how GB gets good usage out of depth

It sucks because GB is pretty banged up and Vikes are getting healthy. Smith and Pace are back.

If The Packers Win this wounded they’ll need some serious praise.
 

rmontro

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
4,968
Reaction score
1,572
If the Packers were healthy, I'd give them the edge but that's not the case. Looks like 4-5 starters are out. Watson, Alexander, Walker, Williams and perhaps Bullard. Vikings are completely healthy, that's why they're winning all those close games.
Saw this video by Jon Gruden. He does a nice job of breaking down the game, but he picks the Vikings because of the injuries. Minnesota is healthy, and the Packers like you say. He makes a good point, although I would add we've been playing well without some of those guys.

You must be logged in to see this image or video!
 

weeds

Fiber deprived old guy.
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
6,207
Reaction score
2,171
Location
Oshkosh, WI
...and to nobody's surprise, Florio's site which always leans to Vikies for whatever it's worth has this to say, the Vikies have a lot on the line too. It's not just the Packers trying to prove they belong with the big boys.

11-4 Packers (-1) at 13-2 Vikings, Sunday 4:25 p.m. ET, Fox (Kevin Burkhardt and Tom Brady)

By rule, game couldn’t be moved to prime time because the first match was played on CBS. At least one of the annual games between NFC division rivals must be played on Fox, where it was flexed to 4:25 p.m. ET.

The last time around, Minnesota led 28-0 before holding on to win, 31-29.

The Vikings secure the No. 1 seed (and the division title) if they win out. If the Vikings lose to the Packers, the Lions can clinch the top seed with a win on Monday night.

Minnesota quarterback has 16 touchdowns and one interception over the past six weeks. Green Bay quarterback Jordan Love and eight touchdowns and no interceptions in the last five games.

Receiver Justin Jefferson has 349 receiving yards and five touchdown catches in the last three games.

A win by the Vikings will give them their first nine-game winning streak since starting the 1975 season at 10-0.
 

tahoebum

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
Location
Nevada.
This ****** me off and maybe it's just a perception on my part, but even in years past when they were playing on artificial turf it seems like we have a long injury list and they don't even have a hangnail whenever we play them.
It may be perception. After the death of the 3rd round draft pick this summer, the Vikes also lost a starting CB, their LT, and JJ McCarthy for the year. Darrisaw out is a big loss as he is easily their best O lineman and as a top 5 NFL left tackle. Ivan Pace their defensive captain is also questionable.

IMO, this is a battle of two top 7 NFL teams and will likely be a great game decided by turnovers or one or two big offensive plays. The Pack has and all time win percentage of .572 but has won just 51.5% of the games since the Vikings became a team in 1961 so it’s always a battle.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,559
Reaction score
7,404
One thing I’ve been doing recently is going back and watching the previous meeting. It’s not a perfect reflection on both teams strengths, but it’s the best one we have as far as how do we play directly on matchups.

Observations:

1. Jordan Love was absolutely, positively, unequivocally both playing partially injured and rusty. For over 2 quarters the majority of throws were off timing, too high, too low or extremely poor decisions. Love passes were more often .5 sec late. It was a D grade performance by him across 2 full quarters imo. One of his worst accuracy games across near 2 seasons.
2. While both teams were undisciplined, GB was over the top making mistakes that have free biscuits to MN. I’d put that game and our 1st Lions “rain” game as the pure sloppiest play. The dropped passes (partly bad throws) were consistently bad. Yellow flags at every corner.

3. Christian Watson was lost end of 1st qtr and Luke Musgrave also went out very early. Both were integral plans as evidenced by targets early. Musgrave was 3/3 16 yards (25 snaps) and Watson 0/1 (9 snaps) Both had little to zero impact last meeting. So #9 status in this one is only neutral or a + from last meeting. Projecting Musgrave will conceivably be used limited but similar to last meeting. He had 8 snaps vs Saints last week. 20 snaps?

4. Vikings are a very good Run D, but we did move the ball closer to average on them. Hard to Run the ball down at 0-28. Should see a little more clock control. Hopefully we get Jacobs involved in short passing where he’s been very effective lately.

5. Narveson was terrible. Possibly lost us that game directly. TWO first half drives spoiled when he shanked 2 Kicks that erased -6 points. Highly unlikely that McNamath misses multiple tries. More likely he Wins the game than multiple missed FG.

6. Several times we rushed 4 on 3rd and 10+. Each time MN nailed a 20 yard pass. Preston played at D+ grade. He looked like he was checked out going through motions. We appeared to stay in lanes so QB wouldn’t run. Hopefully Haf saw that. I’d rather be aggressive and send 5 and make him throw a 5-10 yarder in 3rd n 14. Stop letting them dictate and pick our secondary apart.
 
Last edited:

rmontro

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
4,968
Reaction score
1,572
...and to nobody's surprise, Florio's site which always leans to Vikies for whatever it's worth has this to say, the Vikies have a lot on the line too. It's not just the Packers trying to prove they belong with the big boys.
Good point, really the Vikings are playing for bigger stakes than we are.
 

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
5,120
Reaction score
2,105
One thing I’ve been doing recently is going back and watching the previous meeting. It’s not a perfect reflection on both teams strengths, but it’s the best one we have as far as how do we play directly on matchups.

Observations:

1. Jordan Love was absolutely, positively, unequivocally both playing partially injured and rusty. For over 2 quarters the majority of throws were off timing, too high, too low or extremely poor decisions. Love passes were more often .5 sec late. It was a D grade performance by him across 2 full quarters imo. One of his worst accuracy games across near 2 seasons.
2. While both teams were undisciplined, GB was over the top making mistakes that have free biscuits to MN. I’d put that game and our 1st Lions “rain” game as the pure sloppiest play. The dropped passes (partly bad throws) were consistently bad. Yellow flags at every corner.

3. Christian Watson was lost end of 1st qtr and Luke Musgrave also went out very early. Both were integral plans as evidenced by targets early. Musgrave was 3/3 16 yards (25 snaps) and Watson 0/1 (9 snaps) Both had little to zero impact last meeting. So #9 status in this one is only neutral or a + from last meeting. Projecting Musgrave will conceivably be used limited but similar to last meeting. He had 8 snaps vs Saints last week. 20 snaps?

4. Vikings are a very good Run D, but we did move the ball closer to average on them. Hard to Run the ball down at 0-28. Should see a little more clock control. Hopefully we get Jacobs involved in short passing where he’s been very effective lately.

5. Narveson was terrible. Possibly lost us that game directly. TWO first half drives spoiled when he shanked 2 Kicks that erased -6 points. Highly unlikely that McNamath misses multiple tries. More likely he Wins the game than multiple missed FG.

6. Several times we rushed 4 on 3rd and 10+. Each time MN nailed a 20 yard pass. Preston played at D+ grade. He looked like he was checked out going through motions. We appeared to stay in lanes so QB wouldn’t run. Hopefully Haf saw that. I’d rather be aggressive and send 5 and make him throw a 5-10 yarder in 3rd n 14. Stop letting them dictate and pick our secondary apart.
The Vikings D will likely give the same look as the Lions did several weeks back. Load the box. Get up on the line. And dare Love to go over the top. The difference is that the Vikings will mix up who they blitz and from what side plus up the middle. They will also fake the blitz and drop out of it. This is ******* a young QB and young offense.
Now Rodgers in his prime was very good against the blitz. He picked it up and so did his experienced receivers and his FB. And Rodgers was very accurate with the ball even when hurried.
The Vikings are banking that are young guys will not adjust their routes and Love will hurry his throws. This is when a young offense will show if it is maturing.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,559
Reaction score
7,404
The Vikings D will likely give the same look as the Lions did several weeks back. Load the box. Get up on the line. And dare Love to go over the top. The difference is that the Vikings will mix up who they blitz and from what side plus up the middle. They will also fake the blitz and drop out of it. This is ******* a young QB and young offense.
Now Rodgers in his prime was very good against the blitz. He picked it up and so did his experienced receivers and his FB. And Rodgers was very accurate with the ball even when hurried.
The Vikings are banking that are young guys will not adjust their routes and Love will hurry his throws. This is when a young offense will show if it is maturing.
Agreed. This will be the ideal game to use more 12 Personnel and pinch the OL together. It’s ok to keep 1 TE home for 6 bodies blocking and just stifle any 5 man rushes.
I’d really try to get both RB’s involved in that shorter passing game. Let 5 overpursue into our backfield and give our 2 220lb RB’s some 2 yard dump off with a yard of space and let them churn and spin for 2 more. Stay into that 3rd and manageable 3rd n 5;
3rd n 3 etc.
 

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Top