Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Offensive Talent
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 845161" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>Graham was a mistake, most said it when he was signed and they've been proven right.</p><p></p><p>However, you just blankly state that the Packers could have done more for the offense but that's not really fair. It's easy to say those things without actually figuring out a way to do it. The Packers spent a LOT of money in free agency on defense and, without checking free agent signings last year, I can't think of one that would have significantly improved the team without vastly overpaying (I liked Cole Beasley but not for what he signed for). As for trades, again, it's easy to say the Packers should trade for someone but that doesn't mean they actually CAN trade for someone. Teams have to prioritize needs. I don't think they got complacent about the offense; I think they wanted to fix a defense that lacked talent, relied on having very good offensive talent already on the team (though nonexistent depth), and hired a coach based solely on being an offensive guru (important to remember that mlf was basically thought to be an improvement for the offense).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 845161, member: 9033"] Graham was a mistake, most said it when he was signed and they've been proven right. However, you just blankly state that the Packers could have done more for the offense but that's not really fair. It's easy to say those things without actually figuring out a way to do it. The Packers spent a LOT of money in free agency on defense and, without checking free agent signings last year, I can't think of one that would have significantly improved the team without vastly overpaying (I liked Cole Beasley but not for what he signed for). As for trades, again, it's easy to say the Packers should trade for someone but that doesn't mean they actually CAN trade for someone. Teams have to prioritize needs. I don't think they got complacent about the offense; I think they wanted to fix a defense that lacked talent, relied on having very good offensive talent already on the team (though nonexistent depth), and hired a coach based solely on being an offensive guru (important to remember that mlf was basically thought to be an improvement for the offense). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Offensive Talent
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top