PackinMSP
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2018
- Messages
- 797
- Reaction score
- 56
Everyone seems to say that the Offensive Scheme is built around early 2000's to 2010 schemes that rely on beating "man to man" coverage, which is a HUGE reason why players aren't "open enough" (as AR put it)
The thing with that kind of offense is, you need a WR corp of Jennnings, Jones, Nelson, Driver, Finley... pretty much all above average to star level players to work.
It's the old "thinking" that our #3 WR is better than your #3 CB...
Even running slant patterns, I suppose that is still somewhat of a "1 on 1"type of mismatch. The WR has to get enough separation from the DB to be "open enough". This is same for Fly/Go routes and Drag/In routes.
What kind of new offensive scheme and/or WR/TE route combinations is everyone expecting?
More natural pick plays? more timing? more bunch plays?
???
The thing with that kind of offense is, you need a WR corp of Jennnings, Jones, Nelson, Driver, Finley... pretty much all above average to star level players to work.
It's the old "thinking" that our #3 WR is better than your #3 CB...
Even running slant patterns, I suppose that is still somewhat of a "1 on 1"type of mismatch. The WR has to get enough separation from the DB to be "open enough". This is same for Fly/Go routes and Drag/In routes.
What kind of new offensive scheme and/or WR/TE route combinations is everyone expecting?
More natural pick plays? more timing? more bunch plays?
???