Green Bay Packers coach Mike McCarthy wouldn’t confirm his team’s reported interest in free agent quarterback Brian Hoyer, although he admitted the Packers personnel staff likely explored other options at the quarterback position after starter Aaron Rodgers went down with a broken collarbone about three weeks ago.
“First off, I can’t confirm (the report). From the time Aaron’s been injured I’ve never once been involved in a conversation about bringing in a veteran quarterback,” McCarthy said Thursday.
since mm isn't the gm, and isn't part of the personnel dept., i doubt this happens.
per: http://packerswire.usatoday.com/201...t-confirm-packers-interest-in-qb-brian-hoyer/
It's because of his comments regarding Kaep and the Natl' Anthem that may be showing the prejudice of not hiring Kaep on an NFL team of which he needs to prove to win his law suit.It does not make sense. Why would Mike McCarthy even be considered as a witness for the Colin Kaepernick hearing?
It's because of his comments regarding Kaep and the Natl' Anthem that may be showing the prejudice of not hiring Kaep on an NFL team of which he needs to prove to win his law suit.
It's because of his comments regarding Kaep and the Natl' Anthem that may be showing the prejudice of not hiring Kaep on an NFL team of which he needs to prove to win his law suit.
what comments?It's because of his comments regarding Kaep and the Natl' Anthem that may be showing the prejudice of not hiring Kaep on an NFL team of which he needs to prove to win his law suit.
That is the most ridiculous accusation.. its totally absurd and he's lost all and any credibility going forward if this is true.It's because of his comments regarding Kaep and the Natl' Anthem that may be showing the prejudice of not hiring Kaep on an NFL team of which he needs to prove to win his law suit.
It's because of his comments regarding Kaep and the Natl' Anthem that may be showing the prejudice of not hiring Kaep on an NFL team of which he needs to prove to win his law suit.
These that are in the linked article.what comments?
People who think Mike McCarthy has any prejudice regarding people sitting for the national anthem should look at the pictures or video of his own players sitting and kneeling. None of them were cut or reprimanded.
That is the most ridiculous accusation.. its totally absurd and he's lost all and any credibility going forward if this is true.
Hmmm, then again.... maybe we can plea bargain and bribe him with an Official Jersey and Packer ball cap? It'd be worth it just to keep him quiet
Kaep's legal team is looking at all the possible evidence they can find right now that may explain or back up his reasons why he thinks he isn't playing on a team right now.And the fact we don't really need a QB doesn't come into the picture? There still is an expectation Rodgers will return (and he's a quick healer) and we've invested in Hundly who needs to be showcased too.
They should go after teams who have permanent/long term QB needs and wonder why Kaep was not considered.
Statement is incorrect, Martellus Bennett has been cut.People who think Mike McCarthy has any prejudice regarding people sitting for the national anthem should look at the pictures or video of his own players sitting and kneeling. None of them were cut or reprimanded.
King and Kendricks haven't been.Statement is incorrect, Martellus Bennett has been cut.
A little thing called a union contract complicates things like that.tell the players.... you are free to stay in the tunnel/locker room for the National Anthem.... but if you choose to be on the field, ypu will be expected to follow "these" standards"...
I agree with all but the last sentence. McCarthy's original statement occurred immediately after the Viking game. It is very understandable that he would make a statement in complete support of his backup. However, after the Saints game, I'm not surprised if they started thinking about alternatives such as Hoyer.Apparently the Packers recently tried to sign Brian Hoyer, but the Patriots were able to snap him up first (Belichick beats out TT again - not that I care that we lost out on Hoyer). This makes the team look bad since McCarthy got incenses when asked about signing Colin Kaepernick, because he had all that time invested in Hundley,
However: Teams are free to not want to sign Kaepernick. And teams are even free to not want to sign Kaepernick because they don't want the political distractions stemming from his anthem protest (although the media will throw mud at them for it). For Kaepernick to win his lawsuit, he needs to prove that at least two teams colluded together to not sign him.
So McCarthy is likely safe, even though the Hoyer situation puts him in a somewhat embarrassing position.
I'm not surprised either. But the media (or rather certain segments of the media) has an agenda to paint teams like the Packers in a bad light for not signing Kaepernick.I agree with all but the last sentence. McCarthy's original statement occurred immediately after the Viking game. It is very understandable that he would make a statement in complete support of his backup. However, after the Saints game, I'm not surprised if they started thinking about alternatives such as Hoyer.
I found this:Poppa San I'm guessing the union contract doesnt specifically address national anthem protocal. Do you have information to the contrary?
Statement is incorrect, Martellus Bennett has been cut.
Apparently the Packers recently tried to sign Brian Hoyer, but the Patriots were able to snap him up first (Belichick beats out TT again - not that I care that we lost out on Hoyer). This makes the team look bad since McCarthy got incenses when asked about signing Colin Kaepernick, because he had all that time invested in Hundley,
However: Teams are free to not want to sign Kaepernick. And teams are even free to not want to sign Kaepernick because they don't want the political distractions stemming from his anthem protest (although the media will throw mud at them for it). For Kaepernick to win his lawsuit, he needs to prove that at least two teams colluded together to not sign him.
So McCarthy is likely safe, even though the Hoyer situation puts him in a somewhat embarrassing position.
Last year Kaepernick had a passer rating of 90.7 to Hoyer's 74.1. Kaepernick threw 16 TDs to 4 INTs. Hoyer had 4 TDs and 4 INTs.I don't know why Brian Hoyer should have anything to do with this. Last year Hoyer was much better than Colin Kaepernick. Remember Kaepernick was benched for Blaine Gabbert and Hoyer stole the starting job from Jay Cutler.
Last year Kaepernick had a passer rating of 90.7 to Hoyer's 74.1. Kaepernick threw 16 TDs to 4 INTs. Hoyer had 4 TDs and 4 INTs.
There is some subjectivity to who is better, but most critics will maintain Kaepernick is the better quarterback.