ivo610,
I didn't include that part because you had already made that point but no one posted the stats included in that article that I did post. And, of course, I provided the link.
BTW, I do find it interesting that you propose a trade of Finley in which you say "1 and a 2 would be pretty enticing" and allege that kind of compensation would be available for a player you don't think makes the Packers better.
And again, Finley played the first FOUR games and got hurt right away vs. Washington.
He started 5 games. I didnt cut out the game rodgers got hurt or the game rodgers didnt play, just went with the games that the player started. If you would would like to work the numbers based on 4 games and however many minutes he played in the 5th be my guest.
Right, I feel we could possibly get a #1 and #2 for a player that didnt make the 2010 Packers better. It doesnt mean he wouldnt work for another team. While you can argue if it was right, its not unheard of. In fact the Broncos traded Brandon Marshall to Miami for 2 2nds. McNabb was traded to Washington last year. Brady Quinn was traded to the Broncos. Dont forget Brett Favre was a 2nd round pick that was traded for a 1st bc the team felt he was not working out for them yet they knew he was valuable.
I know each of those trades was its own situation but the point of naming them was to point out that teams trade players that other teams consider "valuable" even though they see it didnt exactly work out for the team that drafted them.