I agree with you that we SHOULD bring back Lacy.
The AD talk is just a bunch of pipe dream BS, but I was/am a fan of Adrian Peterson going back to his OU games
I DON'T agree with you on assessing Lacy as "elite" earlier though
I think people need to understand that Lacy and Montgomery are what "they are" and how they "fit" into what the Packers are trying to do on Offense.
I believe that:
1. Montgomery has better speed than anyone we have besides Michael... BUT his best asset is to use him out of the back field as a reciever and to motion him and get Empty sets
2. Lacy will and SHOULD be retained as his purpose is to "tire out" defenses after they've been tired out and spread around from our passing offense. I would imagine that it is no fun to tackle Eddie Lacy
Lacy isn't going to be some 1500+ yard monster.. and I don't believe he ever will, or will we ever need him to get that many rushing yards, his primary purpose is to punish the defense after being worn out from the passing attack
In an offense like the Packers you don't have much chance for a 1500 yard RB and you don't need one. I'll take a back that gets 1600 total yards with 1200 rushing and doesn't have to come off the field on passing downs over one who gets 1600 rushing yards but can't be counted on to contribute in the passing game whether it is by catching passes or being able to block. I think Lacy can be productive in the passing game as his numbers increased from year 1 to year 2 and I think the main reason they went down in year 3 was because of his weight and conditioning issues.
I would like a backfield of Lacy and Montgomery and a rookie and maybe Jackson sticking around on the PS or even as the #3 if we don't get a rookie but I have no desire to see Michael back. Like Poker I would not want to see a backfield of Montgomery/Micheal/rookie or any other combination that puts Ty as our primary back without some help. I like Ty a lot and I think he can be good for 15 carries a game plus or minus a few (though I'd prefer 10 carries and 5 catches) but I don't want to have to count on it. I thik Lacy is well worth a look and I'd prefer him over Peterson and Charles even though I've always thought Charles was very under rated.