Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency: TE's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 655129" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>so you think owen daniels would have been an upgrade for the Packers at the position? why? because have Aaron Rodgers? and his numbers would just automatically be better? we ranked a few spots higher than the Broncos in offense, ran the same number of plays, for a lower per play average, had 400 less passing yards, but more passing TD's. Seems they were able to sling the ball around more than us, despite having a 1 winged QB, so it's not as if the pass catchers did not have opportunity. Despite being on a team that slung it around more than we did he did less and scored less. He had a YPC that I expect RR will have too, assuming everyone else is doing their job. It's not as if Daniels was a guy anybody schemed for either. </p><p></p><p>sure we could use a better TE, would have used better QB play, better RB play, better WR play, better Olineplay. of that list, I put RR's at the end. His 8.whatever ypc isn't good, but i do not think it will stay there. I'd be very surprised if he's not at 10+ closer to 11+ next year with the catches and TD's i've said a hundred times on this thread. and we can complain about his low YPC, but then if we'd take out all the patterns within 2 yds of the LOS they seem to throw at him, that clearly doesn't fit his skill set, it would be better already too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 655129, member: 10441"] so you think owen daniels would have been an upgrade for the Packers at the position? why? because have Aaron Rodgers? and his numbers would just automatically be better? we ranked a few spots higher than the Broncos in offense, ran the same number of plays, for a lower per play average, had 400 less passing yards, but more passing TD's. Seems they were able to sling the ball around more than us, despite having a 1 winged QB, so it's not as if the pass catchers did not have opportunity. Despite being on a team that slung it around more than we did he did less and scored less. He had a YPC that I expect RR will have too, assuming everyone else is doing their job. It's not as if Daniels was a guy anybody schemed for either. sure we could use a better TE, would have used better QB play, better RB play, better WR play, better Olineplay. of that list, I put RR's at the end. His 8.whatever ypc isn't good, but i do not think it will stay there. I'd be very surprised if he's not at 10+ closer to 11+ next year with the catches and TD's i've said a hundred times on this thread. and we can complain about his low YPC, but then if we'd take out all the patterns within 2 yds of the LOS they seem to throw at him, that clearly doesn't fit his skill set, it would be better already too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency: TE's
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top