I disagree. Draft classes are as much about right now as they are the future. When teams draft a QB in the 1st Round, they normally need a QB "right now". It used to be in the NFL that you drafted a QB and they sat for a couple years, but the majority of the league 1st Round QBs are the guy immediately. Only Rodgers and most recently Love are the prominent examples of letting a QB carry a clipboard for a bit before they take the starter's role.
When the Packers drafted Jaire and later Josh Jackson, we needed CBs right then and there. When we drafted Gary, we needed an additional pass-rusher (albeit I was expecting full time on the DL) right then. Kenny Clark a couple years earlier was definitely a right now need.
So I don't get where people think the Draft is only about the future. You need an impact player right then and there, who you're hoping will mature into an All-Pro and foundation of your team for the next 7-10 years.
I'm not going to debate our draft from last year again. The point being this same poster *****es about the draft every damn time something doesn't go our way. he hated the Alexander pick too, I know he did. I would bet 1000 dollars right now he didn't like him because it's the MO. Gute's first pick, giving us a chance to win in a big way and he's here *****ing about Gute and drafting.
Newsflash, none of them get them all right, the best might bat .500 on draft day, sometimes.
anyway, go poll 32 NFL GM's, i bet they all say the draft is about the future more than the present. No **** some body else could have had more impact this year than a QB that wasn't active. Thanks for the insight.
and I know we needed DB's when we took Alexander. Yet some still think we spent too many picks on defense. When you don't have the players, what do you do? Ignore it?