Eliot Wolf already is head of scouting in his current role as Director of Player Personnel. He oversees ALL college scouting and pro player scouting operations. He can't go any higher in the ranks from a personnel stand point, except to assume some of TT's duties. TT is 62 and under contract through the 2019 draft, so unless he chooses to retire soon Wolf will probably end-up somewhere else as GM.
Keep in mind the great proteges of Ron Wolf/TT who seized their opportunity elsewhere (including TT in Seattle in 1999+): John Schneider (Seattle), Reggie McKenzie (Oakland) and John Dorsey (KC). I don't know much about him, but Scot McCloughan (Redskins GM) was with the Packers until he followed TT to Seattle in '99, and then was 49er's GM in e 2008-2010.
Unfortunately good talent rises to the top, and many times the openings aren't available in GB.
I'm Jewish you @#$#! !@@$$$# %^#@@!*&* and I hope you ##@$$ your #$%$$%^& with a @!#@$$.No one is saying get rid of TT we should not let a talented young football guy like Wolf walk away by the way have a Nice Christmas hope that does not offend you .
Well, taking over for Al 'never mind the tape, just use the 40 times to set the draft board' Davis is like being a foster parent to Jared from the subway's kids. You don't have to do much to be better. But yeah, Reggie seems to be getting things going in the right direction there.Side note, the ted Thompson method is what turned around Oakland
Wolf has had a lot of offers in the last year to be GM for other teams they better not let him leave I would rather see Ted gone first not a big fan of his !
Eagles, Jets and Miami just this past offseason and there will be more this year Thompson is just ok but Wolf has a lot of up side Colts also showed interest but he turned them all down but this year could be a different story ! League people think he has a great eye for player talent more so then Thompson who no one is running to hire !
Maybe you didn't have a chance to read this entire thread but no one could 'run to hire' Thompson because he's under contract to the Packers. Also, I'd appreciate a quote from either you or Rick12 showing "League people think he has a great eye for player talent more so then Thompson..."Thx, seems more progressive than most on planning...
Believe me if TT was gone this team might even get better players in the Draft if anyone thinks the Packers would go down hill if TT was gone they are sadly mistaken !!!Thx, seems more progressive than most on planning...
Funny you write, "if TT was gone this team MIGHT even get better players in the Draft" and they say without reservation the Packers wouldn't go down hill if Thompson left. You have nothing to base your assumption on and don't even seem to agree with yourself.Believe me if TT was gone this team might even get better players in the Draft if anyone thinks the Packers would go down hill if TT was gone they are sadly mistaken !!!
After enduring the chronic mediocrity of the post-Glory Years, especially the lack of playoff appearances, I envied the Dolphins of the early 1990's because they had put together a long run of winning seasons in their heyday. It was my wish that the Packers would someday enjoy the same kind of success. They have. And while it would be nice to win SBs as frequently as Lombardi's teams had, this Packer organization has had a very nice run at being legitimate contenders. Barring the unforeseen, it may go on for at least several more years -- maybe even longer if the young Mr. Wolf is destined to be the heir apparent to TT and he lucks out finding #12's replacement. Can lightening strike a third time?
Super Bowls: You can't win 'em if you don't get in 'em.
You're right, of course. Most posters dissect everything Packers. Others thrive on dissecting other posters. I'll just have to take my chances.Careful with that. I'm assuming you are meaning it as a plus in favor of Ted but a lot of fans here will point out that with him at the helm we haven't been getting in 'em. You may want to amend that to Super Bowls: You can't win 'em if you don't have a chance to get in 'em.
I don't think they maximized the value of their picks. Baker and Ward probably could have been gotten with the 4th and 7th picks and not the 1st and 4th. They should have moved that first pick. They also took another player with terrible character later in the draft.
I don't care what kind of talent you have with that kind of track record. ****** assault, buying stuff with stolen credit cards, drug arrest and just to prove that he has turned things around he failed his test at the combine.