Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 975661">I believe most Packers' fans who are ready to move on from Rodgers expect that the team will find another HOF quarterback in a heartbeat. When you take a look around the league that's completely unrealistic though. Therefore I enjoy having Rodgers around as long as it takes as I'm well aware it could be a long time before the Packers will have another elite quarterback running the show. I'm quite a lot of folks won't realize how spoiled the Packers have been since 1992 until the team struggles to adequately replace him in the long term.Why would any player agree to a deal below market value so that the owner can pocket even more money???Please provide a list of those players who have taken significantly less money than market value for the team to spend it on some other ones. The majority of players who agree to take a pay cut would have been released otherwise. The ones signing a prove it deal didn't have any other offers in most cases.Spreading the cap hit over several seasons isn't the same as taking a pay cut.As I have mentioned repeatedly, Rodgers deserves part of the blame for the offense struggling as well. I'm still optimistic about the Packers making it back to the Super Bowl with him. That's if he's around for at least another year in 2023.</blockquote>

Total: 132 (members: 4, guests: 128)