Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Duds vs Commanders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 974884" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I’d say Sammy Watkins, Lazard and Cobb could be starters in at least several teams. But availability at WR has plagued us also. Sammy is good when he’s healthy, but he’s been plagued by injury misfortune and he barely practiced and thus probably didn’t need to be a featured WR this quickly. He pulled a Watson and dropped a big one and that is evidence that lack of consistent playing time is a common denominator to lack of concentration.</p><p></p><p>We’ve got a potential deep threat in #9 who’s suffered 3 setbacks since Camp and has barely seen the football field.</p><p></p><p>Our Starting Slot WR (Cobby) is on IR for 4 weeks minimum</p><p></p><p>So left you’ve got Lazard and Doubs are probably somewhere in that WR3-WR4 range until proven consistently otherwise. However let’s face it, they are being paired with our opponents CB1/CB2. That’s just not going to go over well against a good front DL. This was a game we desperately needed a veteran Slot WR and a deep threat to keep them honest. We had neither.</p><p></p><p>Couple all that with Amari Rodgers. He’s like the catalyst to implosion</p><p></p><p>Sprinkle on top 5 or 6 dropped passes and 9 team penalties for nearly 70 yards and it speaks to undisciplined, uncoordinated and ill-prepared = inconsistent play</p><p></p><p>I was happy that we finally started out like 8 runs mixed in at 4.3 per carry and then we largely abandoned our Running game. Yet we were never really down by more than 4 points for the bulk of the game Why?</p><p></p><p>Ok ok we ran at our 1 yard line to avoid a Safety kudos there and picked up 5 yards!! but then after Matt said last week he should’ve run it and then this week he didn’t with a 4th and 1 AND Game in the balance??</p><p>All that after Matt just saying last week it was a mistake at 3rd and 2 with time to burn in scoring position and game in balance and 4 down territory? I’m just stupified</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 974884, member: 10086"] I’d say Sammy Watkins, Lazard and Cobb could be starters in at least several teams. But availability at WR has plagued us also. Sammy is good when he’s healthy, but he’s been plagued by injury misfortune and he barely practiced and thus probably didn’t need to be a featured WR this quickly. He pulled a Watson and dropped a big one and that is evidence that lack of consistent playing time is a common denominator to lack of concentration. We’ve got a potential deep threat in #9 who’s suffered 3 setbacks since Camp and has barely seen the football field. Our Starting Slot WR (Cobby) is on IR for 4 weeks minimum So left you’ve got Lazard and Doubs are probably somewhere in that WR3-WR4 range until proven consistently otherwise. However let’s face it, they are being paired with our opponents CB1/CB2. That’s just not going to go over well against a good front DL. This was a game we desperately needed a veteran Slot WR and a deep threat to keep them honest. We had neither. Couple all that with Amari Rodgers. He’s like the catalyst to implosion Sprinkle on top 5 or 6 dropped passes and 9 team penalties for nearly 70 yards and it speaks to undisciplined, uncoordinated and ill-prepared = inconsistent play I was happy that we finally started out like 8 runs mixed in at 4.3 per carry and then we largely abandoned our Running game. Yet we were never really down by more than 4 points for the bulk of the game Why? Ok ok we ran at our 1 yard line to avoid a Safety kudos there and picked up 5 yards!! but then after Matt said last week he should’ve run it and then this week he didn’t with a 4th and 1 AND Game in the balance?? All that after Matt just saying last week it was a mistake at 3rd and 2 with time to burn in scoring position and game in balance and 4 down territory? I’m just stupified [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
tynimiller
SudsMcBucky
Latest posts
M
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: Magooch
15 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Post Your Top 50...Post Now, Reserve The Right To Complain Later
Latest: tynimiller
50 minutes ago
Draft Talk
My Top 100
Latest: tynimiller
51 minutes ago
Draft Talk
J
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: JDPackers
Today at 1:06 PM
Draft Talk
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:05 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Duds vs Commanders
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
