Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fanindaup" data-source="post: 605020" data-attributes="member: 8875">Considering league veteran minimum is just under $1 mil I would still consider that a low offer. Since you don't think Hawk is worth that much you are questioning Marvin Lewis' ability to judge defenses, or perhaps Lewis thinks AJ may be better suited to playing the middle in a 4-3 to which I hear the Bengals are contemplating a switch while TT thinks AJ has less value as the MLB in a 3-4. Either way Hawk by your estimation isn't worth the $1.85 mil to the Packers so why would TT keep him around? How could he if the Bengals were offering more than he was worth to the team by your own declaration?Today B/R is reporting the Packers have offered BJ Raji a one year deal worth less than $2 million. I'd consider that a bargain as well.Essentially I have to believe TT knows more than I do about the situation and I have to trust ultimately that he's going to be right more often than I am when I disagree with him. I'm not saying you or I or anyone else can't disagree with TT, but history has been on his side more often than not.The evidence in this case points to the conclusion that TT believes better options are available, or he wouldn't have gutted the position.</blockquote>

Total: 59 (members: 1, guests: 58)

S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
- Latest: Schultz
- Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
- Latest: Schultz
- Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
- Latest: El Guapo
- Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: Thirteen Below
- Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
- Latest: tynimiller
- Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk