Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 604900"><p>There you go. A surprising secret sauce...a C grade player in coverage. Who would of thunk it.</p><p></p><p>He couldn't run with guys in man coverage. I guess we overlooked the fact he might have applied some savvy in zone coverage with the play in front of him, perhaps the match of Bobby Wagner is that role. Shocking. Maybe Kuechly overplayed the run with his downhill mentality while Hawk underplayed it to compensate for his speed loss in coverage. The measure of the player is balancing the good (or average) against the bad and see what you get.</p><p></p><p>I think we're pretty close to the threshold for "improvement over Hawk" at this point. It's higher than "somebody on the current roster would<em> likely</em> be better". That's M.D. Jennings thinking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 604900"] There you go. A surprising secret sauce...a C grade player in coverage. Who would of thunk it. He couldn't run with guys in man coverage. I guess we overlooked the fact he might have applied some savvy in zone coverage with the play in front of him, perhaps the match of Bobby Wagner is that role. Shocking. Maybe Kuechly overplayed the run with his downhill mentality while Hawk underplayed it to compensate for his speed loss in coverage. The measure of the player is balancing the good (or average) against the bad and see what you get. I think we're pretty close to the threshold for "improvement over Hawk" at this point. It's higher than "somebody on the current roster would[I] likely[/I] be better". That's M.D. Jennings thinking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top