Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Comparing 2008 Packers Roster vs 2023 Packers Roster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 1000983"><p>As others have already pointed out the first two posts you quoted include facts and are definitely not disparaging by any means.</p><p></p><p>I will comment on the other two you mentioned below.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you truly don't want to purposely make me look bad then you shouldn't have taken those posts you quoted above completely out of context. Actually you even edited them to fit your narrative. That seems to have happened on purpose in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>Let's take a look at the actual posts instead of the ones you quoted without any context. Here's the first one with me discussing with Poker about the release of Blake Bortles two years ago:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]19249[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>It should be pretty obvious that it was meant TIC. Of course you made it look completely different by excluding some pretty important information to understand the context. Did that happen by accident? I don't think so.</p><p></p><p>Here's how the discussion actually went on the last of your examples for me disparaging Love (happened two years ago as well):</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]19250[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The point I was trying to make was solely on the Packers not being able to take advantage of having a quarterback on a rookie deal. There was no shot at Love being taken. Of course, you withheld that information as well. Once again I wonder if that happened on accident? As mentioned above I have a hard time believing that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I haven't criticized Love for being drafted by the Packers. Gutekunst is definitely the one to blame.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, while #3 could be considered to be disparaging if I said it in the way OldSchool suggested you can see it was meant TIC as posted above. #4 wasn't even about Love in the first place.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I guess Schultz considered the post to be unfair or derogatory because you made it look as it would fit your narrative.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 1000983"] As others have already pointed out the first two posts you quoted include facts and are definitely not disparaging by any means. I will comment on the other two you mentioned below. If you truly don't want to purposely make me look bad then you shouldn't have taken those posts you quoted above completely out of context. Actually you even edited them to fit your narrative. That seems to have happened on purpose in my opinion. Let's take a look at the actual posts instead of the ones you quoted without any context. Here's the first one with me discussing with Poker about the release of Blake Bortles two years ago: [ATTACH type="full" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-06-19 um 11.22.03.png"]19249[/ATTACH] It should be pretty obvious that it was meant TIC. Of course you made it look completely different by excluding some pretty important information to understand the context. Did that happen by accident? I don't think so. Here's how the discussion actually went on the last of your examples for me disparaging Love (happened two years ago as well): [ATTACH type="full" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-06-19 um 11.25.05.png"]19250[/ATTACH] The point I was trying to make was solely on the Packers not being able to take advantage of having a quarterback on a rookie deal. There was no shot at Love being taken. Of course, you withheld that information as well. Once again I wonder if that happened on accident? As mentioned above I have a hard time believing that. I haven't criticized Love for being drafted by the Packers. Gutekunst is definitely the one to blame. Well, while #3 could be considered to be disparaging if I said it in the way OldSchool suggested you can see it was meant TIC as posted above. #4 wasn't even about Love in the first place. I guess Schultz considered the post to be unfair or derogatory because you made it look as it would fit your narrative. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Half Empty
gopkrs
Latest posts
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
33 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 10:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Best FA in NFL History
Latest: El Guapo
Today at 9:24 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lazard Situation...
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:17 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Should the Packers Start Revoking Season Tickets?
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:13 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Comparing 2008 Packers Roster vs 2023 Packers Roster
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
